lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zpa30mhAqoG5FP1X@debian>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 20:11:30 +0200
From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, dsahern@...nel.org,
	roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] ipv4: Fix incorrect TOS in fibmatch route get
 reply

On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 05:23:54PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> The TOS value that is returned to user space in the route get reply is
> the one with which the lookup was performed ('fl4->flowi4_tos'). This is
> fine when the matched route is configured with a TOS as it would not
> match if its TOS value did not match the one with which the lookup was
> performed.
> 
> However, matching on TOS is only performed when the route's TOS is not
> zero. It is therefore possible to have the kernel incorrectly return a
> non-zero TOS:
> 
>  # ip link add name dummy1 up type dummy
>  # ip address add 192.0.2.1/24 dev dummy1
>  # ip route get fibmatch 192.0.2.2 tos 0xfc
>  192.0.2.0/24 tos 0x1c dev dummy1 proto kernel scope link src 192.0.2.1
> 
> Fix by instead returning the DSCP field from the FIB result structure
> which was populated during the route lookup.
> 
> Output after the patch:
> 
>  # ip link add name dummy1 up type dummy
>  # ip address add 192.0.2.1/24 dev dummy1
>  # ip route get fibmatch 192.0.2.2 tos 0xfc
>  192.0.2.0/24 dev dummy1 proto kernel scope link src 192.0.2.1
> 
> Extend the existing selftests to not only verify that the correct route
> is returned, but that it is also returned with correct "tos" value (or
> without it).

Good catch!

Reviewed-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ