[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8734o98zr9.fsf@cloudflare.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 11:14:34 +0200
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
To: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kuniyu@...zon.com, Rao.Shoaib@...cle.com,
cong.wang@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v3 2/4] selftest/bpf: Support SOCK_STREAM in
unix_inet_redir_to_connected()
On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 10:16 PM +02, Michal Luczaj wrote:
> On 7/13/24 11:45, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 10:33 PM +02, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>>> And looking at that commit[1], inet_unix_redir_to_connected() has its
>>> @type ignored, too. Same treatment?
>>
>> That one will not be a trivial fix like this case. inet_socketpair()
>> won't work for TCP as is. It will fail trying to connect() a listening
>> socket (p0). I recall now that we are in this state due to some
>> abandoned work that began in 75e0e27db6cf ("selftest/bpf: Change udp to
>> inet in some function names").
>
> I've assumed @type applies to AF_UNIX. So I've meant to keep
> inet_socketpair() with SOCK_DGRAM hardcoded (like it is in
> unix_inet_redir_to_connected()), but let the socketpair(AF_UNIX, ...)
> accept @type (like this patch does).
Ah, that is what you had in mind.
Sure, a partial fix gets us closer to a fully working test.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists