[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240717115633.GH14050@ziepe.ca>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 08:56:33 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Omer Shpigelman <oshpigelman@...ana.ai>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"ogabbay@...nel.org" <ogabbay@...nel.org>,
Zvika Yehudai <zyehudai@...ana.ai>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] RDMA/hbl: add habanalabs RDMA driver
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:51:03AM +0000, Omer Shpigelman wrote:
> The only place we have an ops structure is in the device driver,
> similarly to Jason's example. In our code it is struct
> hbl_aux_dev. What
No, hbl_aux_dev is an 'struct auxiliary_device', not a 'struct
device_driver', it is different. I did literally mean struct
device_driver.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists