netdev - Re: [PATCH v3] net: linearizing skb when downgrade gso

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6697f20876b11_34277329417@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 12:32:08 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Fred Li <dracodingfly@...il.com>, 
 pabeni@...hat.com, 
 willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, 
 herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, 
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 ast@...nel.org, 
 daniel@...earbox.net, 
 andrii@...nel.org, 
 song@...nel.org, 
 yonghong.song@...ux.dev, 
 john.fastabend@...il.com, 
 kpsingh@...nel.org, 
 Fred Li <dracodingfly@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: linearizing skb when downgrade gso_size

Fred Li wrote:
> Linearizing skb when downgrade gso_size because it may
> trigger the BUG_ON when segment skb as described in [1].
> 
> v3 changes:
>   linearize skb if having frag_list as Willem de Bruijn suggested[2].
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240626065555.35460-2-dracodingfly@gmail.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/668d5cf1ec330_1c18c32947@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fred Li <dracodingfly@...il.com>

A fix needs a Fixed tag.

This might be the original commit that introduced gso_size adjustment,
commit 6578171a7ff0c ("bpf: add bpf_skb_change_proto helper")

Unless support for frag_list came later.

> ---
>  net/core/filter.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index df4578219e82..70919b532d68 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -3525,13 +3525,21 @@ static int bpf_skb_net_grow(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 off, u32 len_diff,
>  	if (skb_is_gso(skb)) {
>  		struct skb_shared_info *shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
>  
> -		/* Due to header grow, MSS needs to be downgraded. */
> -		if (!(flags & BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_FIXED_GSO))
> -			skb_decrease_gso_size(shinfo, len_diff);
> -
>  		/* Header must be checked, and gso_segs recomputed. */
>  		shinfo->gso_type |= gso_type;
>  		shinfo->gso_segs = 0;
> +
> +		/* Due to header grow, MSS needs to be downgraded.
> +		 * There is BUG_ON When segment the frag_list with
> +		 * head_frag true so linearize skb after downgrade
> +		 * the MSS.
> +		 */

Super tiny nit: no capitalization of When in the middle of a sentence.

> +		if (!(flags & BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_FIXED_GSO)) {
> +			skb_decrease_gso_size(shinfo, len_diff);
> +			if (shinfo->frag_list)
> +				return skb_linearize(skb);

I previously asked whether it was safe to call pskb_expand_head from
within a BPF external function. There are actually plenty of existing
examples of this, so this is fine.

> +		}
> +
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 2.33.0
>