| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Zpf-kvdAh1HRIchW@fedora-x1>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 13:25:38 -0400
From: Kamal Heib <kheib@...hat.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next] i40e: Add support for fw health report
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 03:35:34PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 09:11:48PM CEST, kheib@...hat.com wrote:
> >Add support for reporting fw status via the devlink health report.
> >
> >Example:
> > # devlink health show pci/0000:02:00.0 reporter fw
> > pci/0000:02:00.0:
> > reporter fw
> > state healthy error 0 recover 0
> > # devlink health diagnose pci/0000:02:00.0 reporter fw
> > Status: normal
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Kamal Heib <kheib@...hat.com>
> >---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h | 1 +
> > .../net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_devlink.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++
> > .../net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_devlink.h | 2 +
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c | 15 +++++
> > 4 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h
> >index d546567e0286..f94671b6e7c6 100644
> >--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h
> >+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h
> >@@ -465,6 +465,7 @@ static inline const u8 *i40e_channel_mac(struct i40e_channel *ch)
> > struct i40e_pf {
> > struct pci_dev *pdev;
> > struct devlink_port devlink_port;
> >+ struct devlink_health_reporter *fw_health_report;
> > struct i40e_hw hw;
> > DECLARE_BITMAP(state, __I40E_STATE_SIZE__);
> > struct msix_entry *msix_entries;
> >diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_devlink.c
> >index cc4e9e2addb7..ad91c150cdba 100644
> >--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_devlink.c
> >+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_devlink.c
> >@@ -122,6 +122,25 @@ static int i40e_devlink_info_get(struct devlink *dl,
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> >+static int i40e_fw_reporter_diagnose(struct devlink_health_reporter *reporter,
> >+ struct devlink_fmsg *fmsg,
> >+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> >+{
> >+ struct i40e_pf *pf = devlink_health_reporter_priv(reporter);
> >+
> >+ if (test_bit(__I40E_RECOVERY_MODE, pf->state))
> >+ devlink_fmsg_string_pair_put(fmsg, "Status", "recovery");
>
> Is it "Status" or "Mode" ?
>
Thank you for your review.
It is "Mode", I'll fix it in v2.
>
> >+ else
> >+ devlink_fmsg_string_pair_put(fmsg, "Status", "normal");
> >+
> >+ return 0;
> >+}
> >+
> >+static const struct devlink_health_reporter_ops i40e_fw_reporter_ops = {
> >+ .name = "fw",
> >+ .diagnose = i40e_fw_reporter_diagnose,
> >+};
> >+
> > static const struct devlink_ops i40e_devlink_ops = {
> > .info_get = i40e_devlink_info_get,
> > };
> >@@ -233,3 +252,41 @@ void i40e_devlink_destroy_port(struct i40e_pf *pf)
> > {
> > devlink_port_unregister(&pf->devlink_port);
> > }
> >+
> >+/**
> >+ * i40e_devlink_create_health_reporter - Create the health reporter for this PF
> >+ * @pf: the PF to create reporter for
> >+ *
> >+ * Create health reporter for this PF.
> >+ *
> >+ * Return: zero on success or an error code on failure.
> >+ **/
> >+int i40e_devlink_create_health_reporter(struct i40e_pf *pf)
> >+{
> >+ struct devlink *devlink = priv_to_devlink(pf);
> >+ struct device *dev = &pf->pdev->dev;
> >+ int rc = 0;
> >+
> >+ devl_lock(devlink);
> >+ pf->fw_health_report =
> >+ devl_health_reporter_create(devlink, &i40e_fw_reporter_ops, 0, pf);
> >+ if (IS_ERR(pf->fw_health_report)) {
> >+ rc = PTR_ERR(pf->fw_health_report);
> >+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to create fw reporter, err = %d\n", rc);
> >+ }
> >+ devl_unlock(devlink);
> >+
> >+ return rc;
> >+}
> >+
> >+/**
> >+ * i40e_devlink_destroy_health_reporter - Destroy the health reporter
> >+ * @pf: the PF to cleanup
> >+ *
> >+ * Destroy the health reporter
> >+ **/
> >+void i40e_devlink_destroy_health_reporter(struct i40e_pf *pf)
> >+{
> >+ if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pf->fw_health_report))
> >+ devlink_health_reporter_destroy(pf->fw_health_report);
> >+}
> >diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_devlink.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_devlink.h
> >index 469fb3d2ee25..018679094bb5 100644
> >--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_devlink.h
> >+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_devlink.h
> >@@ -14,5 +14,7 @@ void i40e_devlink_register(struct i40e_pf *pf);
> > void i40e_devlink_unregister(struct i40e_pf *pf);
> > int i40e_devlink_create_port(struct i40e_pf *pf);
> > void i40e_devlink_destroy_port(struct i40e_pf *pf);
> >+int i40e_devlink_create_health_reporter(struct i40e_pf *pf);
> >+void i40e_devlink_destroy_health_reporter(struct i40e_pf *pf);
> >
> > #endif /* _I40E_DEVLINK_H_ */
> >diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> >index cbcfada7b357..13cad5f58029 100644
> >--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> >+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> >@@ -15370,6 +15370,9 @@ static bool i40e_check_recovery_mode(struct i40e_pf *pf)
> > dev_crit(&pf->pdev->dev, "Firmware recovery mode detected. Limiting functionality.\n");
> > dev_crit(&pf->pdev->dev, "Refer to the Intel(R) Ethernet Adapters and Devices User Guide for details on firmware recovery mode.\n");
> > set_bit(__I40E_RECOVERY_MODE, pf->state);
> >+ if (pf->fw_health_report)
> >+ devlink_health_report(pf->fw_health_report,
> >+ "FW recovery mode detected", pf);
>
> You report it on "FW" reporter. Why "FW" is needed in the message?
>
You are right, I will remove it in v2.
>
> >
> > return true;
> > }
> >@@ -15636,6 +15639,14 @@ static int i40e_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> > err = -ENOMEM;
> > goto err_pf_alloc;
> > }
> >+
> >+ err = i40e_devlink_create_health_reporter(pf);
> >+ if (err) {
> >+ dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> >+ "Failed to create health reporter %d\n", err);
> >+ goto err_health_reporter;
> >+ }
> >+
> > pf->next_vsi = 0;
> > pf->pdev = pdev;
> > set_bit(__I40E_DOWN, pf->state);
> >@@ -16180,6 +16191,8 @@ static int i40e_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> > err_pf_reset:
> > iounmap(hw->hw_addr);
> > err_ioremap:
> >+ i40e_devlink_destroy_health_reporter(pf);
> >+err_health_reporter:
> > i40e_free_pf(pf);
> > err_pf_alloc:
> > pci_release_mem_regions(pdev);
> >@@ -16209,6 +16222,8 @@ static void i40e_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >
> > i40e_devlink_unregister(pf);
> >
> >+ i40e_devlink_destroy_health_reporter(pf);
> >+
> > i40e_dbg_pf_exit(pf);
> >
> > i40e_ptp_stop(pf);
> >--
> >2.45.2
> >
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists