netdev - Re: [RESEND PATCH net-next v3 3/4] net: phy: aquantia: wait for the GLOBAL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=McCa3qUL5Mjxn2TVUeJzqaBaDCx52z8i7hfO=tfYFGgWA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 21:05:34 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, 
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, 
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, Brad Griffis <bgriffis@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH net-next v3 3/4] net: phy: aquantia: wait for the
 GLOBAL_CFG to start returning real values

On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 7:42 PM Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 18/07/2024 15:59, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >>>>> TBH I only observed the issue on AQR115C. I don't have any other model
> >>>>> to test with. Is it fine to fix it by implementing
> >>>>> aqr115_fill_interface_modes() that would first wait for this register
> >>>>> to return non-0 and then call aqr107_fill_interface_modes()?
> >>>>
> >>>> I am doing a bit more testing. We have seen a few issues with this PHY
> >>>> driver and so I am wondering if we also need something similar for the
> >>>> AQR113C variant too.
> >>>>
> >>>> Interestingly, the product brief for these PHYs [0] do show that both
> >>>> the AQR113C and AQR115C both support 10M. So I wonder if it is our
> >>>> ethernet controller that is not supporting 10M? I will check on this too.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Oh you have an 113c? I didn't get this. Yeah, weird, all docs say it
> >>> should support 10M. In fact all AQR PHYs should hence my initial
> >>> change.
> >>
> >>
> >> Yes we have an AQR113C. I agree it should support this, but for whatever
> >> reason this is not advertised. I do see that 10M is advertised as
> >> supported by the network ...
> >>
> >>    Link partner advertised link modes:  10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
> >>                                         100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
> >>                                         1000baseT/Full
> >>
> >> My PC that is on the same network supports 10M, but just not this Tegra
> >> device. I am checking to see if this is expected for this device.
> >>
> >
> > I sent a patch for you to test. I think that even if it doesn't fully
> > fix the issue you're observing, it's worth picking it up as it reduces
> > the impact of the workaround I introduced.
>
>
> Thanks! I will test this tonight.
>
> > I'll be off next week so I'm sending it quickly with the hope it will be useful.
>
>
> OK thanks for letting me know.
>
> Another thought I had, which is also quite timely, is that I have
> recently been testing a patch [0] as I found that this actually resolves
> an issue where we occasionally see our device fail to get an IP address.
>
> This was sent out over a year ago and sadly we failed to follow up :-(
>
> Russell was concerned if this would make the function that was being
> changed fail if it did not have the link (if I am understanding the
> comments correctly). However, looking at the code now, I see that the
> aqr107_read_status() function checks if '!phydev->link' before we poll
> the TX ready status, and so I am wondering if this change is OK? From my
> testing it does work. I would be interested to know if this may also
> resolve your issue?
>
> With this change [0] I have been able to do 500 boots on our board and
> verify that the ethernet controller is able to get an IP address every
> time. Without this change it would fail to get an IP address anywhere
> from 1-100 boots typically.
>
> I will test your patch in the same way, but I am wondering if both are
> trying to address the same sort of issue?
>

The patch you linked does not fix the suspend/resume either. :(

Bartosz

> Cheers
> Jon
>
> [0]
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-tegra/20230628124326.55732-3-ruppala@nvidia.com/#t
>
> --
> nvpublic