[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240719094119.35c62455087d.I68eb9c0f02545b364b79a59f2110f2cf5682a8e2@changeid>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 09:41:18 -0700
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: bonding: correctly annotate RCU in bond_should_notify_peers()
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
RCU use in bond_should_notify_peers() looks wrong, since it does
rcu_dereference(), leaves the critical section, and uses the
pointer after that.
Luckily, it's called either inside a nested RCU critical section
or with the RTNL held.
Annotate it with rcu_dereference_rtnl() instead, and remove the
inner RCU critical section.
Fixes: 4cb4f97b7e36 ("bonding: rebuild the lock use for bond_mii_monitor()")
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index d19aabf5d4fb..2ed0da068490 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -1121,13 +1121,10 @@ static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
return bestslave;
}
+/* must be called in RCU critical section or with RTNL held */
static bool bond_should_notify_peers(struct bonding *bond)
{
- struct slave *slave;
-
- rcu_read_lock();
- slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ struct slave *slave = rcu_dereference_rtnl(bond->curr_active_slave);
if (!slave || !bond->send_peer_notif ||
bond->send_peer_notif %
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists