lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024072204-jester-exploit-d249@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 09:40:08 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>,
	linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Günter Röck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
	Marcin Wojtas <marcin.s.wojtas@...il.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] device property: document
 device_for_each_child_node macro

On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 09:15:26AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
> > + * Unavailable nodes are skipped i.e. this macro is implicitly _available_.
> …
> 
> How good does presented information fit together in this comment line?


Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ