[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d0ff81d2-3297-4b13-855b-810c11390dc9@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 14:24:59 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Amery Hung <ameryhung@...il.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, yangpeihao@...u.edu.cn,
daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com,
martin.lau@...nel.org, sinquersw@...il.com, toke@...hat.com,
jhs@...atatu.com, jiri@...nulli.us, sdf@...gle.com,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, yepeilin.cs@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 05/11] bpf: net_sched: Support implementation of
Qdisc_ops in bpf
On 7/14/24 10:51 AM, Amery Hung wrote:
> +static const struct bpf_func_proto *
> +bpf_qdisc_get_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id,
> + const struct bpf_prog *prog)
> +{
> + switch (func_id) {
Instead of an empty switch, it should be useful to provide the skb->data related
helper. It can start with read only dynptr first, the BPF_FUNC_dynptr_read
helper here.
Also, the kfuncs: bpf_dynptr_slice and bpf_dynptr_from_skb_rdonly.
> + default:
> + return bpf_base_func_proto(func_id, prog);
[ ... ]
> + }
> +}
> +
> +BTF_ID_LIST_SINGLE(bpf_sk_buff_ids, struct, sk_buff)
> +BTF_ID_LIST_SINGLE(bpf_sk_buff_ptr_ids, struct, bpf_sk_buff_ptr)
> +
> +static bool bpf_qdisc_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
> + enum bpf_access_type type,
> + const struct bpf_prog *prog,
> + struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
> +{
> + struct btf *btf = prog->aux->attach_btf;
> + u32 arg;
> +
> + arg = get_ctx_arg_idx(btf, prog->aux->attach_func_proto, off);
> + if (!strcmp(prog->aux->attach_func_name, "enqueue")) {
> + if (arg == 2) {
> + info->reg_type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED;
> + info->btf = btf;
> + info->btf_id = bpf_sk_buff_ptr_ids[0];
> + return true;
This will allow type == BPF_WRITE to ctx which should be rejected. The below
bpf_tracing_btf_ctx_access() could have rejected it.
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return bpf_tracing_btf_ctx_access(off, size, type, prog, info);
> +}
> +
[ ... ]
> +
> +static bool is_unsupported(u32 member_offset)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(unsupported_ops); i++) {
> + if (member_offset == unsupported_ops[i])
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static int bpf_qdisc_check_member(const struct btf_type *t,
> + const struct btf_member *member,
> + const struct bpf_prog *prog)
> +{
> + if (is_unsupported(__btf_member_bit_offset(t, member) / 8))
Note that the ".check_member" and the "is_unsupported" can be removed as you
also noticed on the recent unsupported ops cleanup patches.
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> + return 0;
> +}
[ ... ]
> +static struct Qdisc_ops __bpf_ops_qdisc_ops = {
> + .enqueue = Qdisc_ops__enqueue,
> + .dequeue = Qdisc_ops__dequeue,
> + .peek = Qdisc_ops__peek,
> + .init = Qdisc_ops__init,
> + .reset = Qdisc_ops__reset,
> + .destroy = Qdisc_ops__destroy,
> + .change = Qdisc_ops__change,
> + .attach = Qdisc_ops__attach,
> + .change_tx_queue_len = Qdisc_ops__change_tx_queue_len,
> + .change_real_num_tx = Qdisc_ops__change_real_num_tx,
> + .dump = Qdisc_ops__dump,
> + .dump_stats = Qdisc_ops__dump_stats,
Similar to the above is_unsupported comment. The unsupported ops should be
removed from the cfi_stubs.
> + .ingress_block_set = Qdisc_ops__ingress_block_set,
> + .egress_block_set = Qdisc_ops__egress_block_set,
> + .ingress_block_get = Qdisc_ops__ingress_block_get,
> + .egress_block_get = Qdisc_ops__egress_block_get,
> +};
> +
> +static struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_Qdisc_ops = {
> + .verifier_ops = &bpf_qdisc_verifier_ops,
> + .reg = bpf_qdisc_reg,
> + .unreg = bpf_qdisc_unreg,
> + .check_member = bpf_qdisc_check_member,
> + .init_member = bpf_qdisc_init_member,
> + .init = bpf_qdisc_init,
> + .validate = bpf_qdisc_validate,
".validate" is optional. The empty "bpf_qdisc_validate" can be removed.
> + .name = "Qdisc_ops",
> + .cfi_stubs = &__bpf_ops_qdisc_ops,
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +};
Powered by blists - more mailing lists