lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d1267639-c885-4a27-ac15-b4199e38ec99@icloud.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 08:23:35 +0800
From: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@...oud.com>
To: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>,
 Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: rfkill: Correct parameter type for
 rfkill_set_hw_state_reason()

On 2024/7/27 06:51, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 7/15/2024 6:39 AM, Zijun Hu wrote:
>> From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
>>
>> Change type of parameter @reason to enum rfkill_hard_block_reasons for
>> API rfkill_set_hw_state_reason() according to its comments.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/rfkill.h | 5 ++---
>>  net/rfkill/core.c      | 7 +------
>>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/rfkill.h b/include/linux/rfkill.h
>> index 373003ace639..4f7558267541 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/rfkill.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/rfkill.h
>> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ void rfkill_destroy(struct rfkill *rfkill);
>>   * Prefer to use rfkill_set_hw_state if you don't need any special reason.
>>   */
>>  bool rfkill_set_hw_state_reason(struct rfkill *rfkill,
>> -				bool blocked, unsigned long reason);
>> +		bool blocked, enum rfkill_hard_block_reasons reason);
> 
> function parameters should align on (
> 
will correct it for v2
>>  /**
>>   * rfkill_set_hw_state - Set the internal rfkill hardware block state
>>   * @rfkill: pointer to the rfkill class to modify.
>> @@ -279,8 +279,7 @@ static inline void rfkill_destroy(struct rfkill *rfkill)
>>  }
>>  
>>  static inline bool rfkill_set_hw_state_reason(struct rfkill *rfkill,
>> -					      bool blocked,
>> -					      unsigned long reason)
>> +		bool blocked, enum rfkill_hard_block_reasons reason)
> 
> function parameters should align on (
> 

will correct it for v2
>>  {
>>  	return blocked;
>>  }
>> diff --git a/net/rfkill/core.c b/net/rfkill/core.c
>> index 7a5367628c05..f8ed6431b2f5 100644
>> --- a/net/rfkill/core.c
>> +++ b/net/rfkill/core.c
>> @@ -539,18 +539,13 @@ bool rfkill_get_global_sw_state(const enum rfkill_type type)
>>  #endif
>>  
>>  bool rfkill_set_hw_state_reason(struct rfkill *rfkill,
>> -				bool blocked, unsigned long reason)
>> +		bool blocked, enum rfkill_hard_block_reasons reason)
> 
> function parameters should align on (
> 
will correct it for v2
>>  {
>>  	unsigned long flags;
>>  	bool ret, prev;
>>  
>>  	BUG_ON(!rfkill);
>>  
>> -	if (WARN(reason & ~(RFKILL_HARD_BLOCK_SIGNAL |
>> -			    RFKILL_HARD_BLOCK_NOT_OWNER),
>> -		 "hw_state reason not supported: 0x%lx", reason))
>> -		return rfkill_blocked(rfkill);
>> -
> 
> did you validate that all callers are actually passing a valid enum?
> that is something you should describe in your commit since this is a change
> beyond just changing the prototype
> 
yes. actually, ALL callers within kernel tree only use enum for the API.
will add that description within v2.
thanks
>>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&rfkill->lock, flags);
>>  	prev = !!(rfkill->hard_block_reasons & reason);
>>  	if (blocked) {
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: 338a93cf4a18c2036b567e9f613367f7a52f2511
>> change-id: 20240715-rfkill_fix-335afa2e88ca
>>
>> Best regards,
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ