[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d1267639-c885-4a27-ac15-b4199e38ec99@icloud.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 08:23:35 +0800
From: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@...oud.com>
To: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: rfkill: Correct parameter type for
rfkill_set_hw_state_reason()
On 2024/7/27 06:51, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 7/15/2024 6:39 AM, Zijun Hu wrote:
>> From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
>>
>> Change type of parameter @reason to enum rfkill_hard_block_reasons for
>> API rfkill_set_hw_state_reason() according to its comments.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/rfkill.h | 5 ++---
>> net/rfkill/core.c | 7 +------
>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/rfkill.h b/include/linux/rfkill.h
>> index 373003ace639..4f7558267541 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/rfkill.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/rfkill.h
>> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ void rfkill_destroy(struct rfkill *rfkill);
>> * Prefer to use rfkill_set_hw_state if you don't need any special reason.
>> */
>> bool rfkill_set_hw_state_reason(struct rfkill *rfkill,
>> - bool blocked, unsigned long reason);
>> + bool blocked, enum rfkill_hard_block_reasons reason);
>
> function parameters should align on (
>
will correct it for v2
>> /**
>> * rfkill_set_hw_state - Set the internal rfkill hardware block state
>> * @rfkill: pointer to the rfkill class to modify.
>> @@ -279,8 +279,7 @@ static inline void rfkill_destroy(struct rfkill *rfkill)
>> }
>>
>> static inline bool rfkill_set_hw_state_reason(struct rfkill *rfkill,
>> - bool blocked,
>> - unsigned long reason)
>> + bool blocked, enum rfkill_hard_block_reasons reason)
>
> function parameters should align on (
>
will correct it for v2
>> {
>> return blocked;
>> }
>> diff --git a/net/rfkill/core.c b/net/rfkill/core.c
>> index 7a5367628c05..f8ed6431b2f5 100644
>> --- a/net/rfkill/core.c
>> +++ b/net/rfkill/core.c
>> @@ -539,18 +539,13 @@ bool rfkill_get_global_sw_state(const enum rfkill_type type)
>> #endif
>>
>> bool rfkill_set_hw_state_reason(struct rfkill *rfkill,
>> - bool blocked, unsigned long reason)
>> + bool blocked, enum rfkill_hard_block_reasons reason)
>
> function parameters should align on (
>
will correct it for v2
>> {
>> unsigned long flags;
>> bool ret, prev;
>>
>> BUG_ON(!rfkill);
>>
>> - if (WARN(reason & ~(RFKILL_HARD_BLOCK_SIGNAL |
>> - RFKILL_HARD_BLOCK_NOT_OWNER),
>> - "hw_state reason not supported: 0x%lx", reason))
>> - return rfkill_blocked(rfkill);
>> -
>
> did you validate that all callers are actually passing a valid enum?
> that is something you should describe in your commit since this is a change
> beyond just changing the prototype
>
yes. actually, ALL callers within kernel tree only use enum for the API.
will add that description within v2.
thanks
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&rfkill->lock, flags);
>> prev = !!(rfkill->hard_block_reasons & reason);
>> if (blocked) {
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: 338a93cf4a18c2036b567e9f613367f7a52f2511
>> change-id: 20240715-rfkill_fix-335afa2e88ca
>>
>> Best regards,
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists