netdev - Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Device Passthrough Considered Harmful?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240728160336.GG30973@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 19:03:36 +0300
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, ksummit@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, jgg@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Device Passthrough Considered Harmful?

On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 11:34:34AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 17:27:31 +0300 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> 
> > I know this is a topic proposed for the maintainers summit, but given
> > the number of people who seem to have an opinion and be interested in
> > dicussing it, would a session at LPC be a better candidate ? I don't
> > expect the maintainer summit to invite all relevant experts from all
> > subsystems, that would likely overflow the room.
> > 
> > The downside of an LPC session is that it could easily turn into a
> > heated stage fight, and there are probably also quite a few arguments
> > that can't really be made in the open :-S
> 
> You can always submit a BoF. We have also had last minute BoFs made if
> there's rooms available.

We could also possibly expand the V4L2 vs. DRM discussion in the Complex
Camera MC to cover this, as there's an important overlap.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart