[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a3f49b5-45b2-4999-a364-60d035bbd11f@lunn.ch>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 21:45:32 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
Cc: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@...hat.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, kuba@...nel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, lucas.demarchi@...el.com,
masahiroy@...nel.org, mcgrof@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, woojung.huh@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: usb: lan78xx: add weak dependency with micrel phy
module
> Basically, the way I see it, weakdeps are the right solution for the
> problem at hand, i.e. for the generation of the initial ramdisk with
> all the possible PHY driver modules.
Sorry, but i still don't see how this works.
Say you get this one patch merged. What then? You throw all other PHY
drivers which don't have a weakdep out of the initramfs? That
potentially breaks around 200 MAC drivers who need those PHYs you have
discarded.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists