netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v6 14/14] test/vsock: add vsock dgram tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMB2axNS6QEBuj1vMToy80fXvtJEzo_MzTgYQ1xc7__6jXNAVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:06:14 -0700
From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@...il.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc: stefanha@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com, 
	xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, 
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, 
	wei.liu@...nel.org, decui@...rosoft.com, bryantan@...are.com, 
	vdasa@...are.com, pv-drivers@...are.com, dan.carpenter@...aro.org, 
	simon.horman@...igine.com, oxffffaa@...il.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, 
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, 
	bpf@...r.kernel.org, bobby.eshleman@...edance.com, jiang.wang@...edance.com, 
	amery.hung@...edance.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v6 14/14] test/vsock: add vsock dgram tests

On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 7:43 AM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 09:25:55PM GMT, Amery Hung wrote:
> >From: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>
> >
> >From: Jiang Wang <jiang.wang@...edance.com>
> >
> >This commit adds tests for vsock datagram.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Jiang Wang <jiang.wang@...edance.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <amery.hung@...edance.com>
> >---
> > tools/testing/vsock/util.c       |  177 ++++-
> > tools/testing/vsock/util.h       |   10 +
> > tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 1032 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > 3 files changed, 1099 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/util.c b/tools/testing/vsock/util.c
> >index 554b290fefdc..14d6cd90ca15 100644
> >--- a/tools/testing/vsock/util.c
> >+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/util.c
> >@@ -154,7 +154,8 @@ static int vsock_connect(unsigned int cid, unsigned int port, int type)
> >       int ret;
> >       int fd;
> >
> >-      control_expectln("LISTENING");
> >+      if (type != SOCK_DGRAM)
> >+              control_expectln("LISTENING");
>
> Why it is not needed?
>

I think we actually need it. I will add control_write("LISTENING") in
vsock_dgram_bind().

> BTW this patch is too big to be reviewed, please split it.

Will do.

Thank you,
Amery

>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>
> >
> >       fd = socket(AF_VSOCK, type, 0);
> >       if (fd < 0) {
> >@@ -189,6 +190,11 @@ int vsock_seqpacket_connect(unsigned int cid, unsigned int port)
> >       return vsock_connect(cid, port, SOCK_SEQPACKET);
> > }
> >

[...]