| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240729124406.1824592-5-tariqt@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 15:44:05 +0300
From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Jay
Vosburgh" <jv@...sburgh.net>, Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Gal Pressman
<gal@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>, Jianbo Liu
<jianbol@...dia.com>, Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>, Tariq Toukan
<tariqt@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 4/4] bonding: change ipsec_lock from spin lock to mutex
From: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>
In the cited commit, bond->ipsec_lock is added to protect ipsec_list,
hence xdo_dev_state_add and xdo_dev_state_delete are called inside
this lock. As ipsec_lock is spin lock and such xfrmdev ops may sleep,
"scheduling while atomic" will be triggered when changing bond's
active slave.
[ 101.055189] BUG: scheduling while atomic: bash/902/0x00000200
[ 101.055726] Modules linked in:
[ 101.058211] CPU: 3 PID: 902 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4+ #1
[ 101.058760] Hardware name:
[ 101.059434] Call Trace:
[ 101.059436] <TASK>
[ 101.060873] dump_stack_lvl+0x51/0x60
[ 101.061275] __schedule_bug+0x4e/0x60
[ 101.061682] __schedule+0x612/0x7c0
[ 101.062078] ? __mod_timer+0x25c/0x370
[ 101.062486] schedule+0x25/0xd0
[ 101.062845] schedule_timeout+0x77/0xf0
[ 101.063265] ? asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40
[ 101.063724] ? __bpf_trace_itimer_state+0x10/0x10
[ 101.064215] __wait_for_common+0x87/0x190
[ 101.064648] ? usleep_range_state+0x90/0x90
[ 101.065091] cmd_exec+0x437/0xb20 [mlx5_core]
[ 101.065569] mlx5_cmd_do+0x1e/0x40 [mlx5_core]
[ 101.066051] mlx5_cmd_exec+0x18/0x30 [mlx5_core]
[ 101.066552] mlx5_crypto_create_dek_key+0xea/0x120 [mlx5_core]
[ 101.067163] ? bonding_sysfs_store_option+0x4d/0x80 [bonding]
[ 101.067738] ? kmalloc_trace+0x4d/0x350
[ 101.068156] mlx5_ipsec_create_sa_ctx+0x33/0x100 [mlx5_core]
[ 101.068747] mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0x47b/0xaa0 [mlx5_core]
[ 101.069312] bond_change_active_slave+0x392/0x900 [bonding]
[ 101.069868] bond_option_active_slave_set+0x1c2/0x240 [bonding]
[ 101.070454] __bond_opt_set+0xa6/0x430 [bonding]
[ 101.070935] __bond_opt_set_notify+0x2f/0x90 [bonding]
[ 101.071453] bond_opt_tryset_rtnl+0x72/0xb0 [bonding]
[ 101.071965] bonding_sysfs_store_option+0x4d/0x80 [bonding]
[ 101.072567] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1a0
[ 101.073033] vfs_write+0x2d8/0x400
[ 101.073416] ? alloc_fd+0x48/0x180
[ 101.073798] ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0
[ 101.074175] do_syscall_64+0x52/0x110
[ 101.074576] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
As bond_ipsec_add_sa_all and bond_ipsec_del_sa_all are only called
from bond_change_active_slave, which requires holding the RTNL lock.
And bond_ipsec_add_sa and bond_ipsec_del_sa are xfrm state
xdo_dev_state_add and xdo_dev_state_delete APIs, which are in user
context. So ipsec_lock doesn't have to be spin lock, change it to
mutex, and thus the above issue can be resolved.
Fixes: 9a5605505d9c ("bonding: Add struct bond_ipesc to manage SA")
Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
include/net/bonding.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 763d807be311..bced29813478 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -439,38 +439,33 @@ static int bond_ipsec_add_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs,
rcu_read_lock();
bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
- if (!slave) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ real_dev = slave ? slave->dev : NULL;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (!real_dev)
return -ENODEV;
- }
- real_dev = slave->dev;
if (!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add ||
netif_is_bond_master(real_dev)) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Slave does not support ipsec offload");
- rcu_read_unlock();
return -EINVAL;
}
ipsec = kmalloc(sizeof(*ipsec), GFP_ATOMIC);
- if (!ipsec) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (!ipsec)
return -ENOMEM;
- }
xs->xso.real_dev = real_dev;
err = real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add(xs, extack);
if (!err) {
ipsec->xs = xs;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ipsec->list);
- spin_lock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
list_add(&ipsec->list, &bond->ipsec_list);
- spin_unlock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
} else {
kfree(ipsec);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
return err;
}
@@ -482,34 +477,44 @@ static void bond_ipsec_add_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
struct slave *slave;
rcu_read_lock();
- slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
- if (!slave)
- goto out;
+ slave = rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
+ real_dev = slave ? slave->dev : NULL;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (!real_dev)
+ return;
- real_dev = slave->dev;
+ mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
if (!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add ||
netif_is_bond_master(real_dev)) {
- spin_lock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
if (!list_empty(&bond->ipsec_list))
slave_warn(bond_dev, real_dev,
"%s: no slave xdo_dev_state_add\n",
__func__);
- spin_unlock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
goto out;
}
- spin_lock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
+ struct net_device *dev = ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev;
+
+ /* If new state is added before ipsec_lock acquired */
+ if (dev) {
+ if (dev == real_dev)
+ continue;
+
+ dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(ipsec->xs);
+ if (dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
+ dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(ipsec->xs);
+ }
+
ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = real_dev;
if (real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add(ipsec->xs, NULL)) {
slave_warn(bond_dev, real_dev, "%s: failed to add SA\n", __func__);
ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = NULL;
}
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
out:
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
}
/**
@@ -530,6 +535,8 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
rcu_read_lock();
bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
+ real_dev = slave ? slave->dev : NULL;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
if (!slave)
goto out;
@@ -537,7 +544,6 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
if (!xs->xso.real_dev)
goto out;
- real_dev = slave->dev;
WARN_ON(xs->xso.real_dev != real_dev);
if (!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
@@ -549,7 +555,7 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(xs);
out:
- spin_lock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
if (ipsec->xs == xs) {
list_del(&ipsec->list);
@@ -557,8 +563,7 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
break;
}
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
}
static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
@@ -569,14 +574,13 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
struct slave *slave;
rcu_read_lock();
- slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
- if (!slave) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ slave = rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
+ real_dev = slave ? slave->dev : NULL;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (!real_dev)
return;
- }
- real_dev = slave->dev;
- spin_lock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
if (!ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev)
continue;
@@ -594,8 +598,7 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
}
ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = NULL;
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
}
static void bond_ipsec_free_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
@@ -5902,7 +5905,7 @@ void bond_setup(struct net_device *bond_dev)
/* set up xfrm device ops (only supported in active-backup right now) */
bond_dev->xfrmdev_ops = &bond_xfrmdev_ops;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bond->ipsec_list);
- spin_lock_init(&bond->ipsec_lock);
+ mutex_init(&bond->ipsec_lock);
#endif /* CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD */
/* don't acquire bond device's netif_tx_lock when transmitting */
@@ -5951,6 +5954,10 @@ static void bond_uninit(struct net_device *bond_dev)
__bond_release_one(bond_dev, slave->dev, true, true);
netdev_info(bond_dev, "Released all slaves\n");
+#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD
+ mutex_destroy(&bond->ipsec_lock);
+#endif /* CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD */
+
bond_set_slave_arr(bond, NULL, NULL);
list_del_rcu(&bond->bond_list);
diff --git a/include/net/bonding.h b/include/net/bonding.h
index b61fb1aa3a56..8bb5f016969f 100644
--- a/include/net/bonding.h
+++ b/include/net/bonding.h
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ struct bonding {
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD
struct list_head ipsec_list;
/* protecting ipsec_list */
- spinlock_t ipsec_lock;
+ struct mutex ipsec_lock;
#endif /* CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD */
struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
};
--
2.44.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists