[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <111ac84e-0d22-43cb-953e-fc5f029fe37c@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 10:45:15 +0200
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, nic_swsd@...ltek.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.10 03/27] r8169: remove detection of chip
version 11 (early RTL8168b)
On 28.07.2024 02:52, Sasha Levin wrote:
> From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 982300c115d229565d7af8e8b38aa1ee7bb1f5bd ]
>
> This early RTL8168b version was the first PCIe chip version, and it's
> quite quirky. Last sign of life is from more than 15 yrs ago.
> Let's remove detection of this chip version, we'll see whether anybody
> complains. If not, support for this chip version can be removed a few
> kernel versions later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/875cdcf4-843c-420a-ad5d-417447b68572@gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
> index 7b9e04884575e..d2d46fe17631a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
> @@ -2274,7 +2274,9 @@ static enum mac_version rtl8169_get_mac_version(u16 xid, bool gmii)
>
> /* 8168B family. */
> { 0x7c8, 0x380, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_17 },
> - { 0x7c8, 0x300, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_11 },
> + /* This one is very old and rare, let's see if anybody complains.
> + * { 0x7c8, 0x300, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_11 },
> + */
>
> /* 8101 family. */
> { 0x7c8, 0x448, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_39 },
It may be the case that there are still few users out there with this ancient hw.
We will know better once 6.11 is out for a few month. In this case we would have to
revert this change.
I don't think it's a change which should go to stable.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists