lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240730061638.1831002-4-tariqt@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 09:16:32 +0300
From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Gal Pressman
	<gal@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>, Yevgeny Kliteynik
	<kliteyn@...dia.com>, Alex Vesker <valex@...dia.com>, Tariq Toukan
	<tariqt@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 3/8] net/mlx5: DR, Fix 'stack guard page was hit' error in dr_rule

From: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...dia.com>

This patch reduces the size of hw_ste_arr_optimized array that is
allocated on stack from 640 bytes (5 match STEs + 5 action STES)
to 448 bytes (2 match STEs + 5 action STES).
This fixes the 'stack guard page was hit' issue, while still fitting
majority of the usecases (up to 2 match STEs).

Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Vesker <valex@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_rule.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_rule.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_rule.c
index 042ca0349124..d1db04baa1fa 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_rule.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_rule.c
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 /* don't try to optimize STE allocation if the stack is too constaraining */
 #define DR_RULE_MAX_STES_OPTIMIZED 0
 #else
-#define DR_RULE_MAX_STES_OPTIMIZED 5
+#define DR_RULE_MAX_STES_OPTIMIZED 2
 #endif
 #define DR_RULE_MAX_STE_CHAIN_OPTIMIZED (DR_RULE_MAX_STES_OPTIMIZED + DR_ACTION_MAX_STES)
 
-- 
2.44.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ