[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240801-linkfield-bowl-v1-1-d58f68967802@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 21:00:03 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next] linkmode: Change return type of linkmode_andnot
to bool
linkmode_andnot() simply returns the result of bitmap_andnot().
And the return type of bitmap_andnot() is bool.
So it makes sense for the return type of linkmode_andnot()
to also be bool.
I checked all call-sites and they either ignore the return
value or treat it as a bool.
Compile tested only.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/68088998-4486-4930-90a4-96a32f08c490@lunn.ch/
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
---
include/linux/linkmode.h | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/linkmode.h b/include/linux/linkmode.h
index d94bfd9ac8cc..3b9de09871f6 100644
--- a/include/linux/linkmode.h
+++ b/include/linux/linkmode.h
@@ -37,8 +37,9 @@ static inline bool linkmode_empty(const unsigned long *src)
return bitmap_empty(src, __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS);
}
-static inline int linkmode_andnot(unsigned long *dst, const unsigned long *src1,
- const unsigned long *src2)
+static inline bool linkmode_andnot(unsigned long *dst,
+ const unsigned long *src1,
+ const unsigned long *src2)
{
return bitmap_andnot(dst, src1, src2, __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists