lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87frrn6hz2.fsf@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 23:38:37 +0200
From: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>
CC: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Joe Damato
	<jdamato@...tly.com>, <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] selftests: net-drv: exercise queue
 stats when the device is down


Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me> writes:

> On 08/01, Petr Machata wrote:
>> 
>> Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me> writes:
>> 
>> > On 07/31, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 13:34:58 +0200 Petr Machata wrote:
>> >> > > +        qstat = netfam.qstats_get({"ifindex": cfg.ifindex}, dump=True)
>> >> > > +    except NlError as e:
>> >> > > +        if e.error == 95:  
>> >> > 
>> >> > Could you do this as if e.error == errno.ENOTSUP?
>> >> 
>> >> just to be clear EOPNOTSUPP ..
>> >
>> > That might be the reason it's coded explicitly as 95? :-D
>> 
>> Both exist, I just didn't notice the latter.
>> 
>> >>> import errno
>> >>> errno.ENOTSUP
>> 95
>> >>> errno.EOPNOTSUPP
>> 95
>
> I believe Jakub was talking about kernel's ENOTSUPP (524) vs EOPNOTSUPP (95):
>
> $ grep ENOTSUPP include/linux/errno.h
> #define ENOTSUPP        524     /* Operation is not supported */
>
> $ grep EOPNOTSUPP include/uapi/asm-generic/errno.h
> #define EOPNOTSUPP      95      /* Operation not supported on transport endpoint */
>
> These two are frequently confused.
>
> OTOH, ENOTSUP looks like a userspace/libc invention:
>
> $ grep -w ENOTSUP /usr/include/bits/errno.h
> # ifndef ENOTSUP
> #  define ENOTSUP               EOPNOTSUPP
>
> I'm gonna stick to kernel's EOPNOTSUPP to make it look similar to what
> we have on the kernel side.

Yep, sounds good.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ