netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v8 2/3] sock: add MSG_ZEROCOPY notification mechanism based on msg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240731182908.4584a3e1@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:29:08 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: zijianzhang@...edance.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-api@...r.kernel.org, almasrymina@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
 davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, dsahern@...nel.org,
 axboe@...nel.dk, shuah@...nel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 cong.wang@...edance.com, xiaochun.lu@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 2/3] sock: add MSG_ZEROCOPY notification
 mechanism based on msg_control

On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:20:35 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Btw patchwork shows red for patch 1/3 due to a new error or warning.
> Not sure if it's a false positive, but take a look.

Patchwork is not for contributors, I keep repeating this :|
Were you not in the room at netdev when I was talking about NIPA
or am I this shit at communicating?

Next person pointing someone to patchwork will get a task to fix
something in NIPA.