netdev - [PATCH net-next v3] selftests: net: ksft: print more of the stack for checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240801232317.545577-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Thu,  1 Aug 2024 16:23:17 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	sdf@...ichev.me,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	shuah@...nel.org,
	petrm@...dia.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next v3] selftests: net: ksft: print more of the stack for checks

Print more stack frames and the failing line when check fails.
This helps when tests use helpers to do the checks.

Before:

  # At ./ksft/drivers/net/hw/rss_ctx.py line 92:
  # Check failed 1037698 >= 396893.0 traffic on other queues:[344612, 462380, 233020, 449174, 342298]
  not ok 8 rss_ctx.test_rss_context_queue_reconfigure

After:

  # Check| At ./ksft/drivers/net/hw/rss_ctx.py, line 387, in test_rss_context_queue_reconfigure:
  # Check|     test_rss_queue_reconfigure(cfg, main_ctx=False)
  # Check| At ./ksft/drivers/net/hw/rss_ctx.py, line 230, in test_rss_queue_reconfigure:
  # Check|     _send_traffic_check(cfg, port, ctx_ref, { 'target': (0, 3),
  # Check| At ./ksft/drivers/net/hw/rss_ctx.py, line 92, in _send_traffic_check:
  # Check|     ksft_lt(sum(cnts[i] for i in params['noise']), directed / 2,
  # Check failed 1045235 >= 405823.5 traffic on other queues (context 1)':[460068, 351995, 565970, 351579, 127270]
  not ok 8 rss_ctx.test_rss_context_queue_reconfigure

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
v3:
 - don't bitwise bools (Petr)
 - add a comment while at it
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/20240731013344.4102038-1-kuba@kernel.org
 - use Stan's iteration suggestion
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/20240729204536.3637577-1-kuba@kernel.org

CC: shuah@...nel.org
CC: petrm@...dia.com
---
 tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/py/ksft.py | 14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/py/ksft.py b/tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/py/ksft.py
index f26c20df9db4..ed20508e1d71 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/py/ksft.py
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/py/ksft.py
@@ -32,8 +32,18 @@ KSFT_RESULT_ALL = True
     global KSFT_RESULT
     KSFT_RESULT = False
 
-    frame = inspect.stack()[2]
-    ksft_pr("At " + frame.filename + " line " + str(frame.lineno) + ":")
+    stack = inspect.stack()
+    started = False
+    for frame in reversed(stack[2:]):
+        # Start printing from the test case function
+        if not started:
+            if frame.function == 'ksft_run':
+                started = True
+            continue
+
+        ksft_pr("Check| At " + frame.filename + ", line " + str(frame.lineno) +
+                ", in " + frame.function + ":")
+        ksft_pr("Check|     " + frame.code_context[0].strip())
     ksft_pr(*args)
 
 
-- 
2.45.2