[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240802102112.9199-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 18:21:05 +0800
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
dsahern@...nel.org,
kuniyu@...zon.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 0/7] tcp: completely support active reset
From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
This time the patch series finally covers all the cases in the active
reset logic. After this, we can know the related exact reason(s).
v4
Link:
1. revise the changelog to avoid future confusion in patch [5/7] (Eric)
2. revise the changelog of patch [6/7] like above.
3. add reviewed-by tags (Eric)
v3
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240731120955.23542-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com/
1. introduce TCP_DISCONNECT_WITH_DATA reason (Eric)
2. use a better name 'TCP_KEEPALIVE_TIMEOUT' (Eric)
3. add three reviewed-by tags (Eric)
v2
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240730133513.99986-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com/
1. use RFC 9293 in the comment and changelog instead of old RFC 793
2. correct the comment and changelog in patch 5
Jason Xing (7):
tcp: rstreason: introduce SK_RST_REASON_TCP_ABORT_ON_CLOSE for active
reset
tcp: rstreason: introduce SK_RST_REASON_TCP_ABORT_ON_LINGER for active
reset
tcp: rstreason: introduce SK_RST_REASON_TCP_ABORT_ON_MEMORY for active
reset
tcp: rstreason: introduce SK_RST_REASON_TCP_STATE for active reset
tcp: rstreason: introduce SK_RST_REASON_TCP_KEEPALIVE_TIMEOUT for
active reset
tcp: rstreason: introduce SK_RST_REASON_TCP_DISCONNECT_WITH_DATA for
active reset
tcp: rstreason: let it work finally in tcp_send_active_reset()
include/net/rstreason.h | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 2 +-
net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c | 6 +++---
4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--
2.37.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists