[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tffqhorela6brffruxx3rq4cksabzzjrg6zosudqddplv7v6hd@2knfbquqsrmi>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 13:27:04 -0500
From: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/14] net: stmmac: add infrastructure for hwifs
to provide PCS
On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 11:46:46AM GMT, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> Allow hwifs to provide a phylink_select_pcs() implementation via struct
> stmmac_ops, which can be used to provide a phylink PCS.
>
> Code analysis shows that when STMMAC_FLAG_HAS_INTEGRATED_PCS is set,
> then:
>
> stmmac_common_interrupt()
> stmmac_ethtool_set_link_ksettings()
> stmmac_ethtool_get_link_ksettings()
>
> will all ignore the presence of the PCS. The latter two will pass the
> ethtool commands to phylink. The former will avoid manipulating the
> netif carrier state behind phylink's back based on the PCS status.
>
> This flag is only set by the ethqos driver. From what I can tell,
> amongst the current kernel DT files that use the ethqos driver, only
> sa8775p-ride.dts enables ethernet, and this defines a SGMII-mode link
> to its PHYs without the "managed" property. Thus, phylink will be
> operating in MLO_AN_PHY mode, and inband mode will not be used.
"only sa8775p-ride.dts enables ethernet" is making this paragraph
confuse me a bit. I think you mean that only sa8775p-ride.dts is the
only device that is upstream and would use the flag?
There's a few other Qualcomm platforms that use the driver, but none of
them are SGMII (and none of them use the flag mentioned).
Otherwise I think this looks good to me.
Thanks,
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists