netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: qca807x: Drop unnecessary and broken DT validation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: 
 <172256223145.32676.8205372678905951335.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 01:30:31 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
 davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: qca807x: Drop unnecessary and broken DT
 validation

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 14:17:03 -0600 you wrote:
> The check for "leds" and "gpio-controller" both being present is never
> true because "leds" is a node, not a property. This could be fixed
> with a check for child node, but there's really no need for the kernel
> to validate a DT. Just continue ignoring the LEDs if GPIOs are present.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next] net: phy: qca807x: Drop unnecessary and broken DT validation
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/46e6acfe3501

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html