| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240804192923.000035bd@Huawei.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 19:29:23 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: <alejandro.lucero-palau@....com>
CC: <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <martin.habets@...inx.com>,
<edward.cree@....com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <richard.hughes@....com>,
Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/15] cxl: allow region creation by type2 drivers
On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 18:28:32 +0100
alejandro.lucero-palau@....com wrote:
> From: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
>
> Creating a CXL region requires userspace intervention through the cxl
> sysfs files. Type2 support should allow accelerator drivers to create
> such cxl region from kernel code.
>
> Adding that functionality and integrating it with current support for
> memory expanders.
>
> Based on https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/168592149709.1948938.8663425987110396027.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com/T/#m84598b534cc5664f5bb31521ba6e41c7bc213758
> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Needs a co-developed or similar given Dan didn't email this patch
(which this sign off list suggests he did).
I'll take another look at the locking, but my main comment is
that it is really confusing so I have no idea if it's right.
Consider different ways of breaking up the code you need
to try and keep the locking obvious.
Jonathan
> +
> +static ssize_t interleave_ways_store(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t len)
> +{
> + struct cxl_region *cxlr = to_cxl_region(dev);
> + unsigned int val;
> + int rc;
> +
> + rc = kstrtouint(buf, 0, &val);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + rc = down_write_killable(&cxl_region_rwsem);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + rc = set_interleave_ways(cxlr, val);
> up_write(&cxl_region_rwsem);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
> return len;
> }
> +
This was probably intentional. Common to group a macro like this
with the function it is using by not having a blank line.
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(interleave_ways);
>
> static ssize_t interleave_granularity_show(struct device *dev,
> @@ -547,21 +556,14 @@ static ssize_t interleave_granularity_show(struct device *dev,
> return rc;
> }
> +static ssize_t interleave_granularity_store(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t len)
> +{
> + struct cxl_region *cxlr = to_cxl_region(dev);
> + int rc, val;
> +
> + rc = kstrtoint(buf, 0, &val);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> rc = down_write_killable(&cxl_region_rwsem);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
> - if (p->state >= CXL_CONFIG_INTERLEAVE_ACTIVE) {
> - rc = -EBUSY;
> - goto out;
> - }
>
> - p->interleave_granularity = val;
> -out:
> + rc = set_interleave_granularity(cxlr, val);
> up_write(&cxl_region_rwsem);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
> return len;
> }
> +
grump.
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(interleave_granularity);
> +/* Establish an empty region covering the given HPA range */
> +static struct cxl_region *construct_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> + struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled)
> +{
> + struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = cxled_to_memdev(cxled);
> + struct range *hpa = &cxled->cxld.hpa_range;
> + struct cxl_region_params *p;
> + struct cxl_region *cxlr;
> + struct resource *res;
> + int rc;
> +
> + cxlr = construct_region_begin(cxlrd, cxled);
> + if (IS_ERR(cxlr))
> + return cxlr;
>
> set_bit(CXL_REGION_F_AUTO, &cxlr->flags);
>
> res = kmalloc(sizeof(*res), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!res) {
> rc = -ENOMEM;
> - goto err;
> + goto out;
> }
>
> *res = DEFINE_RES_MEM_NAMED(hpa->start, range_len(hpa),
> dev_name(&cxlr->dev));
> +
> rc = insert_resource(cxlrd->res, res);
> if (rc) {
> /*
> @@ -3412,6 +3462,7 @@ static struct cxl_region *construct_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> __func__, dev_name(&cxlr->dev));
> }
>
> + p = &cxlr->params;
> p->res = res;
> p->interleave_ways = cxled->cxld.interleave_ways;
> p->interleave_granularity = cxled->cxld.interleave_granularity;
> @@ -3419,24 +3470,124 @@ static struct cxl_region *construct_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
>
> rc = sysfs_update_group(&cxlr->dev.kobj, get_cxl_region_target_group());
> if (rc)
> - goto err;
> + goto out;
>
> dev_dbg(cxlmd->dev.parent, "%s:%s: %s %s res: %pr iw: %d ig: %d\n",
> - dev_name(&cxlmd->dev), dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev), __func__,
> - dev_name(&cxlr->dev), p->res, p->interleave_ways,
> - p->interleave_granularity);
> + dev_name(&cxlmd->dev),
> + dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev), __func__,
> + dev_name(&cxlr->dev), p->res,
> + p->interleave_ways,
> + p->interleave_granularity);
>
> /* ...to match put_device() in cxl_add_to_region() */
> get_device(&cxlr->dev);
> up_write(&cxl_region_rwsem);
> +out:
> + construct_region_end();
two calls to up_write(&cxl_region_rwsem) next to each other?
> + if (rc) {
> + drop_region(cxlr);
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> + }
> + return cxlr;
> +}
> +
> +static struct cxl_region *
> +__construct_new_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> + struct cxl_endpoint_decoder **cxled, int ways)
> +{
> + struct cxl_decoder *cxld = &cxlrd->cxlsd.cxld;
> + struct cxl_region_params *p;
> + resource_size_t size = 0;
> + struct cxl_region *cxlr;
> + int rc, i;
> +
> + /* If interleaving is not supported, why does ways need to be at least 1? */
I think 1 means no interleave. It's simpler to do this than have 0 and 1 both
mean no interleave because 1 works for programmable decoders.
> + if (ways < 1)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> + cxlr = construct_region_begin(cxlrd, cxled[0]);
rethink how this broken up. Taking the cxl_dpa_rwsem
inside this function and is really hard to follow. Ideally
manage it with scoped_guard()
> + if (IS_ERR(cxlr))
> + return cxlr;
> +
> + rc = set_interleave_ways(cxlr, ways);
> + if (rc)
> + goto out;
> +
> + rc = set_interleave_granularity(cxlr, cxld->interleave_granularity);
> + if (rc)
here I think cxl_dpa_rwsem is held.
> + goto out;
> +
> + down_read(&cxl_dpa_rwsem);
> + for (i = 0; i < ways; i++) {
> + if (!cxled[i]->dpa_res)
> + break;
> + size += resource_size(cxled[i]->dpa_res);
> + }
> + up_read(&cxl_dpa_rwsem);
> +
> + if (i < ways)
but not here and they go to the same place.
> + goto out;
> +
> + rc = alloc_hpa(cxlr, size);
> + if (rc)
> + goto out;
> +
> + down_read(&cxl_dpa_rwsem);
> + for (i = 0; i < ways; i++) {
> + rc = cxl_region_attach(cxlr, cxled[i], i);
> + if (rc)
> + break;
> + }
> + up_read(&cxl_dpa_rwsem);
> +
> + if (rc)
> + goto out;
> +
> + rc = cxl_region_decode_commit(cxlr);
> + if (rc)
> + goto out;
>
> + p = &cxlr->params;
> + p->state = CXL_CONFIG_COMMIT;
> +out:
> + construct_region_end();
> + if (rc) {
> + drop_region(cxlr);
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> + }
> return cxlr;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h b/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
> index a0e0795ec064..377bb3cd2d47 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
> @@ -881,5 +881,7 @@ struct cxl_root_decoder *cxl_get_hpa_freespace(struct cxl_port *endpoint,
> int interleave_ways,
> unsigned long flags,
> resource_size_t *max);
> -
Avoid whitespace noise.
> +struct cxl_region *cxl_create_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> + struct cxl_endpoint_decoder **cxled,
> + int ways);
> #endif /* __CXL_MEM_H__ */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists