netdev - Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath12k: use 128 bytes aligned iova in transmit path for WCN7850

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <02a126c3-fb98-4f84-b4e0-86a2dc5b7b33@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 11:20:46 +0800
From: Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@...cinc.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
CC: <ath12k@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        <kernel@...cinc.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath12k: use 128 bytes aligned iova in transmit path
 for WCN7850



On 8/1/2024 11:07 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@...cinc.com> writes:
> 
>> In transmit path, it is likely that the iova is not aligned to PCIe TLP
>> max payload size, which is 128 for WCN7850. Normally in such cases hardware
>> is expected to split the packet into several parts in a manner such that
>> they, other than the first one, have aligned iova. However due to hardware
>> limitations, WCN7850 does not behave like that properly with some specific
>> unaligned iova in transmit path. This easily results in target hang in a
>> KPI transmit test: packet send/receive failure, WMI command send timeout
>> etc. Also fatal error seen in PCIe level:
>>
>> 	...
>> 	Capabilities: ...
>> 		...
>> 		DevSta: ... FatalErr+ ...
>> 		...
>> 	...
>>
>> Work around this by manually moving/reallocating payload buffer such that
>> we can map it to a 128 bytes aligned iova. The moving requires sufficient
>> head room or tail room in skb: for the former we can do ourselves a favor
>> by asking some extra bytes when registering with mac80211, while for the
>> latter we can do nothing.
>>
>> Moving/reallocating buffer consumes additional CPU cycles, but the good news
>> is that an aligned iova increases PCIe efficiency. In my tests on some X86
>> platforms the KPI results are almost consistent.
>>
>> Since this is seen only with WCN7850, add a new hardware parameter to
>> differentiate from others.
>>
>> Tested-on: WCN7850 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@...cinc.com>
> 
> [...]
> 
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/dp_tx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/dp_tx.c
>> @@ -162,6 +162,60 @@ static int ath12k_dp_prepare_htt_metadata(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void ath12k_dp_tx_move_payload(struct sk_buff *skb,
>> +				      unsigned long delta,
>> +				      bool head)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long len = skb->len;
>> +
>> +	if (head) {
>> +		skb_push(skb, delta);
>> +		memmove(skb->data, skb->data + delta, len);
>> +		skb_trim(skb, len);
>> +	} else {
>> +		skb_put(skb, delta);
>> +		memmove(skb->data + delta, skb->data, len);
>> +		skb_pull(skb, delta);
>> +	}
>> +}
> 
> I'm nitpicking, but usually booleans like the head variable here don't
> help with readability. Having two separate functions would be easier to
> read, but this is fine as it's so small.
> 
>> @@ -279,6 +334,23 @@ int ath12k_dp_tx(struct ath12k *ar, struct ath12k_vif *arvif,
>>  		goto fail_remove_tx_buf;
>>  	}
>>  
>> +	if (iova_mask &&
>> +	    (unsigned long)skb->data & iova_mask) {
>> +		ret = ath12k_dp_tx_align_payload(ab, &skb);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			dev_warn_once(ab->dev, "failed to align TX buffer %d\n", ret);
> 
> Why dev_warn_once()? I changed it to ath12k_warn() in the pending
> branch.
> 
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/hw.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/hw.h
>> @@ -96,6 +96,8 @@
>>  #define ATH12K_M3_FILE			"m3.bin"
>>  #define ATH12K_REGDB_FILE_NAME		"regdb.bin"
>>  
>> +#define PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE		128
> 
> PCIE prefix implies that this is in PCI subsystem. I renamed it to
> ATH12K_PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE.
> 
> Please check my changes:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ath/ath.git/commit/?h=pending&id=b603c1e0d94fb1eb0576ef48ebe37c8c1ce86328
looks good to me, thanks.

>