netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net/smc: add the max value of fallback reason count

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ee560f28-0ff3-276c-1e4b-d72bd5a6fa4c@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 08:56:47 +0800
From: shaozhengchao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
To: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>, "D. Wythe"
	<alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: <jaka@...ux.ibm.com>, <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	<guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>, <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>, <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/smc: add the max value of fallback reason
 count

Hi Wenjia:
     I will fix it in V2.

Thank you

Zhengchao Shao

On 2024/8/2 19:17, Wenjia Zhang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 02.08.24 04:38, D. Wythe wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/1/24 7:35 PM, Zhengchao Shao wrote:
>>> The number of fallback reasons defined in the smc_clc.h file has reached
>>> 36. For historical reasons, some are no longer quoted, and there's 33
>>> actually in use. So, add the max value of fallback reason count to 50.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
>>> ---
>>>   net/smc/smc_stats.h | 2 +-
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_stats.h b/net/smc/smc_stats.h
>>> index 9d32058db2b5..ab5aafc6f44c 100644
>>> --- a/net/smc/smc_stats.h
>>> +++ b/net/smc/smc_stats.h
>>> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>>>   #include "smc_clc.h"
>>> -#define SMC_MAX_FBACK_RSN_CNT 30
>>> +#define SMC_MAX_FBACK_RSN_CNT 50
>> It feels more like a fix ？
>>
>>>   enum {
>>>       SMC_BUF_8K,
>>
> 
> Hi Zhengchao,
> 
> IMO It should be 36 instead of 50 because of unnecessary smc_stats_fback 
> element and  unnecessary scanning e.g. in smc_stat_inc_fback_rsn_cnt(). 
> If there is any new reason code coming later, the one who are 
> introducing the new reason code should update the the value 
> correspondingly.
> Btw, I also it is a bug fix other than feature.
> 
> Thanks,
> Wenjia