[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240806082436-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 08:24:57 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, eperezma@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
inux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V6 4/4] virtio-net: synchronize probe with
ndo_set_features
On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 10:22:24AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We calculate guest offloads during probe without the protection of
> rtnl_lock. This lead to race between probe and ndo_set_features. Fix
> this by moving the calculation under the rtnl_lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Fixes tag pls?
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index fc5196ca8d51..1d86aa07c871 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -6596,6 +6596,11 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> netif_carrier_on(dev);
> }
>
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(guest_offloads); i++)
> + if (virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, guest_offloads[i]))
> + set_bit(guest_offloads[i], &vi->guest_offloads);
> + vi->guest_offloads_capable = vi->guest_offloads;
> +
> rtnl_unlock();
>
> err = virtnet_cpu_notif_add(vi);
> @@ -6604,11 +6609,6 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> goto free_unregister_netdev;
> }
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(guest_offloads); i++)
> - if (virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, guest_offloads[i]))
> - set_bit(guest_offloads[i], &vi->guest_offloads);
> - vi->guest_offloads_capable = vi->guest_offloads;
> -
> pr_debug("virtnet: registered device %s with %d RX and TX vq's\n",
> dev->name, max_queue_pairs);
>
> --
> 2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists