[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f42fac4-2a4e-426a-be86-1f4bb79987b4@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 07:43:48 +0300
From: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...nel.org>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>, John Fastabend
<john.fastabend@...il.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug report] NFS patch breaks TLS device-offloaded TX zerocopy
On 05/08/2024 14:43, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>
>
> On 05/08/2024 13:40, Tariq Toukan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> A recent patch [1] to 'fs' broke the TX TLS device-offloaded flow
>> starting from v6.11-rc1.
>>
>> The kernel crashes. Different runs result in different kernel traces.
>> See below [2].
>> All of them disappear once patch [1] is reverted.
>>
>> The issues appears only with "sendfile on and zerocopy on".
>> We couldn't repro with "sendfile off", or with "sendfile on and
>> zerocopy off".
>>
>> The repro test is as simple as a repeated client/server communication
>> (wrk/nginx), with sendfile on and zc on, and with "tls-hw-tx-offload:
>> on".
>>
>> $ for i in `seq 10`; do wrk -b::2:2:2:3 -t10 -c100 -d15 --timeout 5s
>> https://[::2:2:2:2]:20448/16000b.img; done
>>
>> We can provide more details if needed, to help with the analysis and
>> debug.
>
> Does tls sw (i.e. no offload) also break?
>
No it doesn't.
Only the "sendfile with ZC" flow of the TX device-offloaded TLS.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists