[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMdnO-J-G2mUw=RySEMSUj8QmY7CyFe=Si1-Ez9PAuF+knygWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 17:36:30 -0700
From: Jitendra Vegiraju <jitendra.vegiraju@...adcom.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, joabreu@...opsys.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
richardcochran@...il.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux@...linux.org.uk, horms@...nel.org, florian.fainelli@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] net: stmmac: Integrate dwxgmac4 into
stmmac hwif handling
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 3:59 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> > + user_ver = stmmac_get_user_version(priv, GMAC4_VERSION);
> > + if (priv->synopsys_id == DWXGMAC_CORE_4_00 &&
> > + user_ver == DWXGMAC_USER_VER_X22)
> > + mac->dma = &dwxgmac400_dma_ops;
>
> I know nothing about this hardware....
>
> Does priv->synopsys_id == DWXGMAC_CORE_4_0 not imply
> dwxgmac400_dma_ops?
>
> Could a user synthesise DWXGMAC_CORE_4_00 without using
> dwxgmac400_dma_ops? Could dwxgmac500_dma_ops or dwxgmac100_dma_ops be
> used?
Yes, the user can choose between Enhanced DMA , Hyper DMA , Normal DMA.
This SoC support has chosen Hyper DMA for future expandability.
>
> Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists