[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d87cbd1-846c-4a43-9dd3-2238670d650e@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 15:53:17 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Csókás, Bence <csokas.bence@...lan.hu>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>, Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>,
Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resubmit net 1/2] net: fec: Forward-declare
`fec_ptp_read()`
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 10:29:17AM +0200, Csókás, Bence wrote:
> This function is used in `fec_ptp_enable_pps()` through
> struct cyclecounter read(). Forward declarations make
> it clearer, what's happening.
In general, forward declarations are not liked. It is better to move
the code to before it is used.
Since this is a minimal fix for stable, lets allow it. But please wait
for net to be merged into net-next, and submit a cleanup patch which
does move fec_ptp_read() earlier and remove the forward declaration.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists