netdev - [PATCH net v3 3/3] selftests/net: Add coverage for UDP GSO with IPv6 extension headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240807-udp-gso-egress-from-tunnel-v3-3-8828d93c5b45@cloudflare.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2024 19:55:05 +0200
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
 Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, 
 kernel-team@...udflare.com, Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v3 3/3] selftests/net: Add coverage for UDP GSO with
 IPv6 extension headers

After enabling UDP GSO for devices not offering checksum offload, we have
hit a regression where a bad offload warning can be triggered when sending
a datagram with IPv6 extension headers.

Extend the UDP GSO IPv6 tests to cover this scenario.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso.c
index 3e74cfa1a2bf..3f2fca02fec5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso.c
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct testcase {
 	int gso_len;		/* mss after applying gso */
 	int r_num_mss;		/* recv(): number of calls of full mss */
 	int r_len_last;		/* recv(): size of last non-mss dgram, if any */
+	bool v6_ext_hdr;	/* send() dgrams with IPv6 extension headers */
 };
 
 const struct in6_addr addr6 = {
@@ -77,6 +78,8 @@ const struct in_addr addr4 = {
 	__constant_htonl(0x0a000001), /* 10.0.0.1 */
 };
 
+static const char ipv6_hopopts_pad1[8] = { 0 };
+
 struct testcase testcases_v4[] = {
 	{
 		/* no GSO: send a single byte */
@@ -255,6 +258,13 @@ struct testcase testcases_v6[] = {
 		.gso_len = 1,
 		.r_num_mss = 2,
 	},
+	{
+		/* send 2 1B segments with extension headers */
+		.tlen = 2,
+		.gso_len = 1,
+		.r_num_mss = 2,
+		.v6_ext_hdr = true,
+	},
 	{
 		/* send 2B + 2B + 1B segments */
 		.tlen = 5,
@@ -396,11 +406,18 @@ static void run_one(struct testcase *test, int fdt, int fdr,
 	int i, ret, val, mss;
 	bool sent;
 
-	fprintf(stderr, "ipv%d tx:%d gso:%d %s\n",
+	fprintf(stderr, "ipv%d tx:%d gso:%d %s%s\n",
 			addr->sa_family == AF_INET ? 4 : 6,
 			test->tlen, test->gso_len,
+			test->v6_ext_hdr ? "ext-hdr " : "",
 			test->tfail ? "(fail)" : "");
 
+	if (test->v6_ext_hdr) {
+		if (setsockopt(fdt, IPPROTO_IPV6, IPV6_HOPOPTS,
+			       ipv6_hopopts_pad1, sizeof(ipv6_hopopts_pad1)))
+			error(1, errno, "setsockopt ipv6 hopopts");
+	}
+
 	val = test->gso_len;
 	if (cfg_do_setsockopt) {
 		if (setsockopt(fdt, SOL_UDP, UDP_SEGMENT, &val, sizeof(val)))
@@ -412,6 +429,12 @@ static void run_one(struct testcase *test, int fdt, int fdr,
 		error(1, 0, "send succeeded while expecting failure");
 	if (!sent && !test->tfail)
 		error(1, 0, "send failed while expecting success");
+
+	if (test->v6_ext_hdr) {
+		if (setsockopt(fdt, IPPROTO_IPV6, IPV6_HOPOPTS, NULL, 0))
+			error(1, errno, "setsockopt ipv6 hopopts clear");
+	}
+
 	if (!sent)
 		return;
 

-- 
2.40.1