[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zrb0wdmIsksG38Uc@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 22:04:01 -0700
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, daiweili@...il.com,
sasha.neftin@...el.com, kurt@...utronix.de,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net v1] igb: Fix not clearing TimeSync interrupts for
82580
On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 05:23:02PM -0700, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> It was reported that 82580 NICs have a hardware bug that makes it
> necessary to write into the TSICR (TimeSync Interrupt Cause) register
> to clear it.
Bug, or was it a feature?
Or IOW, maybe i210 changed the semantics of the TSICR?
And what about the 82576?
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists