netdev - Re: [RFC net-next 1/6] netdevice: Add napi_affinity_no

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZrsjLS8wRcYL3HxQ@LQ3V64L9R2.home>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 10:11:09 +0100
From: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/6] netdevice: Add napi_affinity_no_change

On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 03:36:42PM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 08/12, Joe Damato wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 01:23:27PM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > On 08/12, Joe Damato wrote:
> > > > Several drivers have their own, very similar, implementations of
> > > > determining if IRQ affinity has changed. Create napi_affinity_no_change
> > > > to centralize this logic in the core.
> > > > 
> > > > This will be used in following commits for various drivers to eliminate
> > > > duplicated code.
> > > > 

[...]

> > > > +bool napi_affinity_no_change(unsigned int irq)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	int cpu_curr = smp_processor_id();
> > > > +	const struct cpumask *aff_mask;
> > > > +
> > > 
> > > [..]
> > > 
> > > > +	aff_mask = irq_get_effective_affinity_mask(irq);
> > > 
> > > Most drivers don't seem to call this on every napi_poll (and
> > > cache the aff_mask somewhere instead). Should we try to keep this
> > > out of the past path as well?
> > 
> > Hm, I see what you mean. It looks like only gve calls it on every
> > poll, while the others use a cached value.
> > 
> > Maybe a better solution is to:
> >   1. Have the helper take the cached affinity mask from the driver
> >      and return true/false.
> >   2. Update gve to cache the mask (like the other 4 are doing).
> 
> SG! GVE is definitely the outlier here.

OK, I'll hack on that for rfcv2 and see what it looks like. Thanks
for the suggestion.

Hopefully the maintainers (or other folks) will chime in on whether
or not I should submit fixes for patches 4 - 6 for the type mismatch
stuff first or just handle it all together.