[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240814075758.163065-2-liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 15:57:57 +0800
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
Ignat Korchagin <ignat@...udflare.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 1/2] selftests: udpgro: report error when receive failed
Currently, we only check the latest senders's exit code. If the receiver
report failed, it is not recoreded. Fix it by checking the exit code
of all the involved processes.
Before:
bad GRO lookup ok
multiple GRO socks ./udpgso_bench_rx: recv: bad packet len, got 1452, expected 14520
./udpgso_bench_rx: recv: bad packet len, got 1452, expected 14520
failed
$ echo $?
0
After:
bad GRO lookup ok
multiple GRO socks ./udpgso_bench_rx: recv: bad packet len, got 1452, expected 14520
./udpgso_bench_rx: recv: bad packet len, got 1452, expected 14520
failed
$ echo $?
1
Fixes: 3327a9c46352 ("selftests: add functionals test for UDP GRO")
Suggested-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgro.sh | 41 ++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgro.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgro.sh
index 11a1ebda564f..7e0164247b83 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgro.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgro.sh
@@ -49,14 +49,15 @@ run_one() {
cfg_veth
- ip netns exec "${PEER_NS}" ./udpgso_bench_rx -C 1000 -R 10 ${rx_args} && \
- echo "ok" || \
- echo "failed" &
+ ip netns exec "${PEER_NS}" ./udpgso_bench_rx -C 1000 -R 10 ${rx_args} &
+ local PID1=$!
wait_local_port_listen ${PEER_NS} 8000 udp
./udpgso_bench_tx ${tx_args}
- ret=$?
- wait $(jobs -p)
+ check_err $?
+ wait ${PID1}
+ check_err $?
+ [ "$ret" -eq 0 ] && echo "ok" || echo "failed"
return $ret
}
@@ -93,16 +94,17 @@ run_one_nat() {
# ... so that GRO will match the UDP_GRO enabled socket, but packets
# will land on the 'plain' one
ip netns exec "${PEER_NS}" ./udpgso_bench_rx -G ${family} -b ${addr1} -n 0 &
- pid=$!
- ip netns exec "${PEER_NS}" ./udpgso_bench_rx -C 1000 -R 10 ${family} -b ${addr2%/*} ${rx_args} && \
- echo "ok" || \
- echo "failed"&
+ local PID1=$!
+ ip netns exec "${PEER_NS}" ./udpgso_bench_rx -C 1000 -R 10 ${family} -b ${addr2%/*} ${rx_args} &
+ local PID2=$!
wait_local_port_listen "${PEER_NS}" 8000 udp
./udpgso_bench_tx ${tx_args}
- ret=$?
- kill -INT $pid
- wait $(jobs -p)
+ check_err $?
+ kill -INT ${PID1}
+ wait ${PID2}
+ check_err $?
+ [ "$ret" -eq 0 ] && echo "ok" || echo "failed"
return $ret
}
@@ -115,16 +117,21 @@ run_one_2sock() {
cfg_veth
ip netns exec "${PEER_NS}" ./udpgso_bench_rx -C 1000 -R 10 ${rx_args} -p 12345 &
- ip netns exec "${PEER_NS}" ./udpgso_bench_rx -C 2000 -R 10 ${rx_args} && \
- echo "ok" || \
- echo "failed" &
+ local PID1=$!
+ ip netns exec "${PEER_NS}" ./udpgso_bench_rx -C 2000 -R 10 ${rx_args} &
+ local PID2=$!
wait_local_port_listen "${PEER_NS}" 12345 udp
./udpgso_bench_tx ${tx_args} -p 12345
+ check_err $?
wait_local_port_listen "${PEER_NS}" 8000 udp
./udpgso_bench_tx ${tx_args}
- ret=$?
- wait $(jobs -p)
+ check_err $?
+ wait ${PID1}
+ check_err $?
+ wait ${PID2}
+ check_err $?
+ [ "$ret" -eq 0 ] && echo "ok" || echo "failed"
return $ret
}
--
2.45.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists