[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mslfxo7a.fsf@kurt.kurt.home>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 14:51:05 +0200
From: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Sriram Yagnaraman <sriram.yagnaraman@....tech>,
magnus.karlsson@...el.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
sriram.yagnaraman@...csson.com, richardcochran@...il.com,
benjamin.steinke@...s-audio.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de, Chandan Kumar
Rout <chandanx.rout@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] igb: add AF_XDP zero-copy Tx support
On Wed Aug 14 2024, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>> >> The amount of irqs can be also controlled by irq coalescing or even
>> >> using busy polling. So I'd rather keep this implementation as simple as
>> >> it is now.
>> >
>> > That has nothing to do with what I was describing.
>>
>> Ok, maybe I misunderstood your suggestion. It seemed to me that adding
>> the RS bit to the last frame of the burst will reduce the amount of
>> raised irqs.
>
> You got it right, but I don't think it's related to any outer settings.
> The main case here is that by doing what I proposed you get much less PCIe
> traffic which in turn yields better performance.
I see, makes sense. Then, let's address this in another patchset also
for igc.
Thanks,
Kurt
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (862 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists