[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66bdb158-7452-4f70-836f-bd4682c04297@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 12:00:40 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: sunyiqi <sunyiqixm@...il.com>, edumazet@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net,
dsahern@...nel.org, kuba@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: remove release/lock_sock in tcp_splice_read
On 8/15/24 10:43, sunyiqi wrote:
> When enters tcp_splice_read, tcp_splice_read will call lock_sock
> for sk in order to prevent other threads acquiring sk and release it
> before return.
>
> But in while(tss.len) loop, it releases and re-locks sk, give the other
> thread a small window to lock the sk.
>
> As a result, release/lock_sock in the while loop in tcp_splice_read may
> cause race condition.
Which race condition exactly? do you have a backtrace?
>
> Fixes: 9c55e01c0cc8 ("[TCP]: Splice receive support.")
> Signed-off-by: sunyiqi <sunyiqixm@...il.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/tcp.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> index e03a342c9162..7a2ce0e2e5be 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> @@ -856,8 +856,6 @@ ssize_t tcp_splice_read(struct socket *sock, loff_t *ppos,
>
> if (!tss.len || !timeo)
> break;
> - release_sock(sk);
> - lock_sock(sk);
This is needed to flush the sk backlog.
Somewhat related, I think we could replace the pair with sk_flush_backlog().
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists