[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bk1ucctj.fsf@toke.dk>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 12:14:48 +0200
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>, bpf
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Linus
Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Jonathan Corbet
<corbet@....net>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Daniel Borkmann
<daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai
Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: bpf-next experiment
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> writes:
> 2. Non-networking bpf commits land in bpf-next/master branch.
> It will form bpf-next PR during the merge window.
>
> 3. Networking related commits (like XDP) land in bpf-next/net branch.
> They will be PR-ed to net-next and ffwded from net-next
> as we do today. All these patches will get to mainline
> via net-next PR.
So from a submitter PoV, someone submitting an XDP-related patch (say),
should base this off of bpf-next/net, and tag it as bpf-next in the
subject? Or should it also be tagged as bpf-next/net?
-Toke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists