netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v17 00/14] Introduce PHY listing and link

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240816101116.0e8e4d6d@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 10:11:16 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, davem@...emloft.net,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Herve Codina
 <herve.codina@...tlin.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Heiner
 Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
 Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>, Jesse Brandeburg
 <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, Marek Behún
 <kabel@...nel.org>, Piergiorgio Beruto <piergiorgio.beruto@...il.com>,
 Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, Nicolò Veronese
 <nicveronese@...il.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
 mwojtas@...omium.org, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Antoine Tenart
 <atenart@...nel.org>, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, Dan Carpenter
 <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>,
 Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v17 00/14] Introduce PHY listing and
 link_topology tracking

On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 19:02:20 +0200 Christophe Leroy wrote:
> So it would be great if the series could be merged for v6.12, and I 
> guess the earliest it is merged into net-next the more time it spends in 
> linux-next before the merge window. Any chance to get it merged anytime 
> soon even without a formal feedback from Russell ? We are really looking 
> forward to getting that series merged and step forward with all the work 
> that depends on it and is awaiting.

Give Russell a few days to respond, then repost. 
Russell said his ability to review code right now may be limited.
I'm not sure whether he would like us to wait for him or just do
our best. In the absence of an opinion - we'll do the latter.