[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240817025624.13157-2-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 10:56:17 +0800
From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
alx@...nel.org,
justinstitt@...gle.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
catalin.marinas@....com,
penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
audit@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
selinux@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Matus Jokay <matus.jokay@...ba.sk>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 1/8] Get rid of __get_task_comm()
We want to eliminate the use of __get_task_comm() for the following
reasons:
- The task_lock() is unnecessary
Quoted from Linus [0]:
: Since user space can randomly change their names anyway, using locking
: was always wrong for readers (for writers it probably does make sense
: to have some lock - although practically speaking nobody cares there
: either, but at least for a writer some kind of race could have
: long-term mixed results
- The BUILD_BUG_ON() doesn't add any value
The only requirement is to ensure that the destination buffer is a valid
array.
- Zeroing is not necessary in current use cases
To avoid confusion, we should remove it. Moreover, not zeroing could
potentially make it easier to uncover bugs. If the caller needs a
zero-padded task name, it should be explicitly handled at the call site.
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wivfrF0_zvf+oj6==Sh=-npJooP8chLPEfaFV0oNYTTBA@mail.gmail.com [0]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=whWtUC-AjmGJveAETKOMeMFSTwKwu99v7+b6AyHMmaDFA@mail.gmail.com/
Suggested-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2jxak5v6dfxlpbxhpm3ey7oup4g2lnr3ueurfbosf5wdo65dk4@srb3hsk72zwq
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Matus Jokay <matus.jokay@...ba.sk>
Cc: Alejandro Colomar <alx@...nel.org>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
---
fs/exec.c | 10 ----------
fs/proc/array.c | 2 +-
include/linux/sched.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
kernel/kthread.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index a47d0e4c54f6..2e468ddd203a 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1264,16 +1264,6 @@ static int unshare_sighand(struct task_struct *me)
return 0;
}
-char *__get_task_comm(char *buf, size_t buf_size, struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
- task_lock(tsk);
- /* Always NUL terminated and zero-padded */
- strscpy_pad(buf, tsk->comm, buf_size);
- task_unlock(tsk);
- return buf;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__get_task_comm);
-
/*
* These functions flushes out all traces of the currently running executable
* so that a new one can be started
diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c
index 34a47fb0c57f..55ed3510d2bb 100644
--- a/fs/proc/array.c
+++ b/fs/proc/array.c
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ void proc_task_name(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *p, bool escape)
else if (p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
get_kthread_comm(tcomm, sizeof(tcomm), p);
else
- __get_task_comm(tcomm, sizeof(tcomm), p);
+ get_task_comm(tcomm, p);
if (escape)
seq_escape_str(m, tcomm, ESCAPE_SPACE | ESCAPE_SPECIAL, "\n\\");
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 33dd8d9d2b85..5f1c8a58bb76 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1096,9 +1096,12 @@ struct task_struct {
/*
* executable name, excluding path.
*
- * - normally initialized setup_new_exec()
- * - access it with [gs]et_task_comm()
- * - lock it with task_lock()
+ * - normally initialized begin_new_exec()
+ * - set it with set_task_comm()
+ * - strscpy_pad() to ensure it is always NUL-terminated and
+ * zero-padded
+ * - task_lock() to ensure the operation is atomic and the name is
+ * fully updated.
*/
char comm[TASK_COMM_LEN];
@@ -1912,10 +1915,27 @@ static inline void set_task_comm(struct task_struct *tsk, const char *from)
__set_task_comm(tsk, from, false);
}
-extern char *__get_task_comm(char *to, size_t len, struct task_struct *tsk);
+/*
+ * - Why not use task_lock()?
+ * User space can randomly change their names anyway, so locking for readers
+ * doesn't make sense. For writers, locking is probably necessary, as a race
+ * condition could lead to long-term mixed results.
+ * The strscpy_pad() in __set_task_comm() can ensure that the task comm is
+ * always NUL-terminated and zero-padded. Therefore the race condition between
+ * reader and writer is not an issue.
+ *
+ * - Why not use strscpy_pad()?
+ * While strscpy_pad() prevents writing garbage past the NUL terminator, which
+ * is useful when using the task name as a key in a hash map, most use cases
+ * don't require this. Zero-padding might confuse users if it’s unnecessary,
+ * and not zeroing might even make it easier to expose bugs. If you need a
+ * zero-padded task name, please handle that explicitly at the call site.
+ *
+ * - ARRAY_SIZE() can help ensure that @buf is indeed an array.
+ */
#define get_task_comm(buf, tsk) ({ \
- BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(buf) != TASK_COMM_LEN); \
- __get_task_comm(buf, sizeof(buf), tsk); \
+ strscpy(buf, (tsk)->comm, ARRAY_SIZE(buf)); \
+ buf; \
})
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
index f7be976ff88a..7d001d033cf9 100644
--- a/kernel/kthread.c
+++ b/kernel/kthread.c
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ void get_kthread_comm(char *buf, size_t buf_size, struct task_struct *tsk)
struct kthread *kthread = to_kthread(tsk);
if (!kthread || !kthread->full_name) {
- __get_task_comm(buf, buf_size, tsk);
+ strscpy(buf, tsk->comm, buf_size);
return;
}
--
2.43.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists