[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47b13aef-29bb-46e6-92bc-8fd24391b05a@uliege.be>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 14:57:39 +0200
From: Justin Iurman <justin.iurman@...ege.be>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
justin.iurman@...ege.be
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] net: ipv6: ioam6: new feature tunsrc
On 8/16/24 19:35, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 14:27:23 +0200 Justin Iurman wrote:
>> This patch provides a new feature (i.e., "tunsrc") for the tunnel (i.e.,
>> "encap") mode of ioam6. Just like seg6 already does, except it is
>> attached to a route. The "tunsrc" is optional: when not provided (by
>> default), the automatic resolution is applied. Using "tunsrc" when
>> possible has a benefit: performance. See the comparison:
>> - before (= "encap" mode): https://ibb.co/bNCzvf7
>> - after (= "encap" mode with "tunsrc"): https://ibb.co/PT8L6yq
>
> No need to extend the selftests ?
Hi Jakub,
I've been wondering too... Currently, it doesn't check the IPv6 header
and only focuses on the IOAM header+data. So I came to the conclusion
that the selftests should not necessarily be updated for that. Although
I'm not closing the door to a future update to include some extra IPv6
header checks. I just think it's not required *now* and in this series.
I'll post -v3 to address your comments below (thanks, by the way!).
Cheers,
Justin
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ioam6_iptunnel.h b/include/uapi/linux/ioam6_iptunnel.h
>> index 38f6a8fdfd34..6cdbd0da7ad8 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/ioam6_iptunnel.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ioam6_iptunnel.h
>> @@ -50,6 +50,13 @@ enum {
>> IOAM6_IPTUNNEL_FREQ_K, /* u32 */
>> IOAM6_IPTUNNEL_FREQ_N, /* u32 */
>>
>> + /* Tunnel src address.
>> + * For encap,auto modes.
>> + * Optional (automatic if
>> + * not provided).
>
> The wrapping of this text appears excessive
>
>> + */
>> + IOAM6_IPTUNNEL_SRC, /* struct in6_addr */
>> +
>> __IOAM6_IPTUNNEL_MAX,
>> };
>
>> @@ -178,6 +186,23 @@ static int ioam6_build_state(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
>> ilwt->freq.n = freq_n;
>>
>> ilwt->mode = mode;
>> +
>> + if (!tb[IOAM6_IPTUNNEL_SRC]) {
>> + ilwt->has_tunsrc = false;
>> + } else {
>> + ilwt->has_tunsrc = true;
>> + ilwt->tunsrc = nla_get_in6_addr(tb[IOAM6_IPTUNNEL_SRC]);
>> +
>> + if (ipv6_addr_any(&ilwt->tunsrc)) {
>> + dst_cache_destroy(&ilwt->cache);
>> + kfree(lwt);
>
> Let's put the cleanup at the end of the function, and use a goto / label
> to jump there.
>
>> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, tb[IOAM6_IPTUNNEL_SRC],
>> + "invalid tunnel source address");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> if (tb[IOAM6_IPTUNNEL_DST])
>> ilwt->tundst = nla_get_in6_addr(tb[IOAM6_IPTUNNEL_DST]);
>>
>> @@ -257,6 +282,8 @@ static int ioam6_do_inline(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
>>
>> static int ioam6_do_encap(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> struct ioam6_lwt_encap *tuninfo,
>> + bool has_tunsrc,
>> + struct in6_addr *tunsrc,
>> struct in6_addr *tundst)
>> {
>> struct dst_entry *dst = skb_dst(skb);
>> @@ -286,8 +313,13 @@ static int ioam6_do_encap(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> hdr->nexthdr = NEXTHDR_HOP;
>> hdr->payload_len = cpu_to_be16(skb->len - sizeof(*hdr));
>> hdr->daddr = *tundst;
>> - ipv6_dev_get_saddr(net, dst->dev, &hdr->daddr,
>> - IPV6_PREFER_SRC_PUBLIC, &hdr->saddr);
>> +
>> + if (has_tunsrc) {
>> + memcpy(&hdr->saddr, tunsrc, sizeof(*tunsrc));
>> + } else {
>> + ipv6_dev_get_saddr(net, dst->dev, &hdr->daddr,
>> + IPV6_PREFER_SRC_PUBLIC, &hdr->saddr);
>> + }
>
> single statement branches, no need for {}
>
>> skb_postpush_rcsum(skb, hdr, len);
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists