netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v17 00/14] Introduce PHY listing and link

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240817174715.77522d52@windsurf>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 17:47:15 +0200
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, Jakub Kicinski
 <kuba@...nel.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
 davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Herve Codina
 <herve.codina@...tlin.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Heiner
 Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
 Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>, Jesse Brandeburg
 <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, Marek Behún
 <kabel@...nel.org>, Piergiorgio Beruto <piergiorgio.beruto@...il.com>,
 Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, Nicolò Veronese
 <nicveronese@...il.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
 mwojtas@...omium.org, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Antoine Tenart
 <atenart@...nel.org>, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, Dan Carpenter
 <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>,
 Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v17 00/14] Introduce PHY listing and
 link_topology tracking

Hello Andrew,

On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 17:43:52 +0200
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:

> > Jakub, as you say it looks solid. I can add to that that I have been using
> > this series widely through the double Ethernet attachment on several boards
> > and it works well, it is stable and more performant than the dirty home-made
> > solution we had on v4.14.  
> 
> Have you posted a Tested-by:
> 
> You can also post Reviewed-by: if you have taken a look at the
> code. It won't have the same value as one from Rusell, but it does add
> some degree of warm fuzzy feeling this code is O.K, and it starts
> building your reputation as a reviewer.

Hmm did you check the replies from Christophe to each patch of this
series? He has already posted a Tested-by and Reviewed-by to every
single patch in the series :-)

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training
https://bootlin.com