[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240816190148.7e915604@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 19:01:48 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "Arinzon, David" <darinzon@...zon.com>
Cc: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin"
<mst@...hat.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "Woodhouse, David"
<dwmw@...zon.co.uk>, "Machulsky, Zorik" <zorik@...zon.com>, "Matushevsky,
Alexander" <matua@...zon.com>, "Bshara, Saeed" <saeedb@...zon.com>,
"Wilson, Matt" <msw@...zon.com>, "Liguori, Anthony" <aliguori@...zon.com>,
"Bshara, Nafea" <nafea@...zon.com>, "Belgazal, Netanel"
<netanel@...zon.com>, "Saidi, Ali" <alisaidi@...zon.com>, "Herrenschmidt,
Benjamin" <benh@...zon.com>, "Kiyanovski, Arthur" <akiyano@...zon.com>,
"Dagan, Noam" <ndagan@...zon.com>, "Agroskin, Shay" <shayagr@...zon.com>,
"Itzko, Shahar" <itzko@...zon.com>, "Abboud, Osama" <osamaabb@...zon.com>,
"Ostrovsky, Evgeny" <evostrov@...zon.com>, "Tabachnik, Ofir"
<ofirt@...zon.com>, "Beider, Ron" <rbeider@...zon.com>, "Chauskin, Igor"
<igorch@...zon.com>, "Bernstein, Amit" <amitbern@...zon.com>, "Parav
Pandit" <parav@...dia.com>, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 2/2] net: ena: Extend customer metrics
reporting support
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 17:32:56 +0000 Arinzon, David wrote:
> > Xuan, Michael, the virtio spec calls out drops due to b/w limit being
> > exceeded, but AWS people say their NICs also count packets buffered but
> > not dropped towards a similar metric.
> >
> > I presume the virtio spec is supposed to cover the same use cases.
> > Have the stats been approved? Is it reasonable to extend the definition of
> > the "exceeded" stats in the virtio spec to cover what AWS specifies?
> > Looks like PR is still open:
> > https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/180
>
> How do we move forward with this patchset?
> Regarding the counter itself, even though we don't support this at
> the moment, I would recommend to keep the queued and dropped as split
> (for example, add tx/rx-hw-queued-ratelimits, or something similar,
> if that makes sense).
Could you share some background for your recommendation?
As you say, the advice contradicts your own code :S
Let's iron this out for virtio's benefit.
You can resend the first patch separately in the meantime.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists