lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cbb9e253-499d-4b11-93ae-63ea7cb9cfa3@lunn.ch>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:16:32 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, tmgross@...ch.edu,
	miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com, aliceryhl@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/6] rust: net::phy implement
 AsRef<kernel::device::Device> trait

> Thanks that's good to know.
> 
> >> So i have to wounder if you are solving this at the correct
> >> level. This should be generic to any device, so the Rust concept of a
> >> device should be stating these guarantees, not each specific type of
> >> device.
> > 
> > It should, why isn't it using the rust binding to Device that we already
> > have:
> > 	https://rust.docs.kernel.org/kernel/device/struct.Device.html
> > or is it?  I'm confused now...
> 
> It is using that one.
> I wanted to verify that we can use that one, since using this
> implementation users can freely increment the refcount of the device
> (without decrementing it before control is given back to PHYLIB). Since
> that seems to be the case, all is fine.

Any driver which is not using the device core is broken, and no amount
of SAFETY is going to fix it.

	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ