[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZsK0AJXxNtJqr9AR@Laptop-X1>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 10:54:56 +0800
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>,
davem@...emloft.net, jv@...sburgh.net, andy@...yhouse.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
jarod@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/4] bonding: fix xfrm real_dev null pointer
dereference
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 02:48:12PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> We shouldn't set real_dev to NULL because packets can be in transit and
> xfrm might call xdo_dev_offload_ok() in parallel. All callbacks assume
> real_dev is set.
>
> Example trace:
> kernel: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000001030
> kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one
> kernel: #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
> kernel: #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
> kernel: PGD 0 P4D 0
> kernel: Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> kernel: CPU: 4 PID: 2237 Comm: ping Not tainted 6.7.7+ #12
> kernel: Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014
> kernel: RIP: 0010:nsim_ipsec_offload_ok+0xc/0x20 [netdevsim]
> kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA
I saw the errors are during bond_ipsec_add_sa_all, which also
set ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = NULL. Should we fix it there?
Thanks
Hangbin
> kernel: Code: e0 0f 0b 48 83 7f 38 00 74 de 0f 0b 48 8b 47 08 48 8b 37 48 8b 78 40 e9 b2 e5 9a d7 66 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 86 80 02 00 00 <83> 80 30 10 00 00 01 b8 01 00 00 00 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 0f 1f
> kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one
> kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffabde81553b98 EFLAGS: 00010246
> kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA
> kernel:
> kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9eb404e74900 RCX: ffff9eb403d97c60
> kernel: RDX: ffffffffc090de10 RSI: ffff9eb404e74900 RDI: ffff9eb3c5de9e00
> kernel: RBP: ffff9eb3c0a42000 R08: 0000000000000010 R09: 0000000000000014
> kernel: R10: 7974203030303030 R11: 3030303030303030 R12: 0000000000000000
> kernel: R13: ffff9eb3c5de9e00 R14: ffffabde81553cc8 R15: ffff9eb404c53000
> kernel: FS: 00007f2a77a3ad00(0000) GS:ffff9eb43bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> kernel: CR2: 0000000000001030 CR3: 00000001122ab000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0
> kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one
> kernel: Call Trace:
> kernel: <TASK>
> kernel: ? __die+0x1f/0x60
> kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA
> kernel: ? page_fault_oops+0x142/0x4c0
> kernel: ? do_user_addr_fault+0x65/0x670
> kernel: ? kvm_read_and_reset_apf_flags+0x3b/0x50
> kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one
> kernel: ? exc_page_fault+0x7b/0x180
> kernel: ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
> kernel: ? nsim_bpf_uninit+0x50/0x50 [netdevsim]
> kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA
> kernel: ? nsim_ipsec_offload_ok+0xc/0x20 [netdevsim]
> kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one
> kernel: bond_ipsec_offload_ok+0x7b/0x90 [bonding]
> kernel: xfrm_output+0x61/0x3b0
> kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA
> kernel: ip_push_pending_frames+0x56/0x80
>
> Fixes: 18cb261afd7b ("bonding: support hardware encryption offload to slaves")
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 65ddb71eebcd..f74bacf071fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -582,7 +582,6 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
> } else {
> slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(ipsec->xs);
> }
> - ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = NULL;
> }
> spin_unlock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> --
> 2.44.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists