netdev - Re: [PATCH iwl-next v6 1/6] igb: Always call igb_xdp_ring_update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZsNDdPTHu2OACpPq@boxer>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:07:00 +0200
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
To: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
CC: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, Przemek Kitszel
	<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "Paolo
 Abeni" <pabeni@...hat.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, "Daniel
 Borkmann" <daniel@...earbox.net>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Richard Cochran
	<richardcochran@...il.com>, Sriram Yagnaraman
	<sriram.yagnaraman@...csson.com>, Benjamin Steinke
	<benjamin.steinke@...s-audio.com>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
	<bigeasy@...utronix.de>, <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Sriram Yagnaraman
	<sriram.yagnaraman@....tech>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v6 1/6] igb: Always call
 igb_xdp_ring_update_tail() under Tx lock

On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 11:24:00AM +0200, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
> From: Sriram Yagnaraman <sriram.yagnaraman@....tech>
> 
> Always call igb_xdp_ring_update_tail() under __netif_tx_lock(), add a
> comment to indicate that. This is needed to share the same TX ring between
> XDP, XSK and slow paths.

Sorry for being a-hole here but I think this should go to -net as a fix...
I should have brought it up earlier, current igb XDP support is racy on
tail updates which you're fixing here.

Do you agree...or not?:)

> 
> Signed-off-by: Sriram Yagnaraman <sriram.yagnaraman@....tech>
> [Kurt: Split patches]
> Signed-off-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> index 11be39f435f3..4d5e5691c9bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> @@ -2914,6 +2914,7 @@ static int igb_xdp(struct net_device *dev, struct netdev_bpf *xdp)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +/* This function assumes __netif_tx_lock is held by the caller. */
>  static void igb_xdp_ring_update_tail(struct igb_ring *ring)
>  {
>  	/* Force memory writes to complete before letting h/w know there
> @@ -3000,11 +3001,11 @@ static int igb_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev, int n,
>  		nxmit++;
>  	}
>  
> -	__netif_tx_unlock(nq);
> -
>  	if (unlikely(flags & XDP_XMIT_FLUSH))
>  		igb_xdp_ring_update_tail(tx_ring);
>  
> +	__netif_tx_unlock(nq);
> +
>  	return nxmit;
>  }
>  
> @@ -8853,12 +8854,14 @@ static void igb_put_rx_buffer(struct igb_ring *rx_ring,
>  
>  static int igb_clean_rx_irq(struct igb_q_vector *q_vector, const int budget)
>  {
> +	unsigned int total_bytes = 0, total_packets = 0;
>  	struct igb_adapter *adapter = q_vector->adapter;
>  	struct igb_ring *rx_ring = q_vector->rx.ring;
> -	struct sk_buff *skb = rx_ring->skb;
> -	unsigned int total_bytes = 0, total_packets = 0;
>  	u16 cleaned_count = igb_desc_unused(rx_ring);
> +	struct sk_buff *skb = rx_ring->skb;
> +	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  	unsigned int xdp_xmit = 0;
> +	struct netdev_queue *nq;
>  	struct xdp_buff xdp;
>  	u32 frame_sz = 0;
>  	int rx_buf_pgcnt;
> @@ -8986,7 +8989,10 @@ static int igb_clean_rx_irq(struct igb_q_vector *q_vector, const int budget)
>  	if (xdp_xmit & IGB_XDP_TX) {
>  		struct igb_ring *tx_ring = igb_xdp_tx_queue_mapping(adapter);
>  
> +		nq = txring_txq(tx_ring);
> +		__netif_tx_lock(nq, cpu);
>  		igb_xdp_ring_update_tail(tx_ring);
> +		__netif_tx_unlock(nq);
>  	}
>  
>  	u64_stats_update_begin(&rx_ring->rx_syncp);
> 
> -- 
> 2.39.2
>