netdev - Re: [PATCH v1 net-next] af_unix: Don't call skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: 
 <172419483700.1261673.12420210983904938531.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 23:00:37 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, kuni1840@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next] af_unix: Don't call skb_get() for OOB skb.

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 16:39:21 -0700 you wrote:
> Since introduced, OOB skb holds an additional reference count with no
> special reason and caused many issues.
> 
> Also, kfree_skb() and consume_skb() are used to decrement the count,
> which is confusing.
> 
> Let's drop the unnecessary skb_get() in queue_oob() and corresponding
> kfree_skb(), consume_skb(), and skb_unref().
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v1,net-next] af_unix: Don't call skb_get() for OOB skb.
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/8594d9b85c07

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html