[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZsXzlQQjMNymDkhJ@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 16:03:01 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
CC: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Jay Vosburgh
<j.vosburgh@...il.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "Jakub
Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>, "Tariq
Toukan" <tariqt@...dia.com>, Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>, Simon Horman
<horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 2/3] bonding: Add ESN support to IPSec HW
offload
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 03:39:48PM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> 2024-08-21, 21:26:00 +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 02:30:41PM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> > > > > +/**
> > > > > + * bond_advance_esn_state - ESN support for IPSec HW offload
> > > > > + * @xs: pointer to transformer state struct
> > > > > + **/
> > > > > +static void bond_advance_esn_state(struct xfrm_state *xs)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct net_device *real_dev;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + rcu_read_lock();
> > > > > + real_dev = bond_ipsec_dev(xs);
> > > > > + if (!real_dev)
> > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
> > > > > + !real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_advance_esn) {
> > > > > + pr_warn("%s: %s doesn't support xdo_dev_state_advance_esn\n", __func__, real_dev->name);
> > > >
> > > > xdo_dev_state_advance_esn is called on the receive path for every
> > > > packet when ESN is enabled (xfrm_input -> xfrm_replay_advance ->
> > > > xfrm_replay_advance_esn -> xfrm_dev_state_advance_esn), this needs to
> > > > be ratelimited.
> > >
> > > How does xfrm_state offload work on bonding?
> > > Does every slave have its own negotiated SA?
> >
> > Yes and no. Bonding only supports xfrm offload with active-backup mode. So only
> > current active slave keep the SA. When active slave changes, the sa on
> > previous slave is deleted and re-added on new active slave.
>
> It's the same SA, there's no DELSA+NEWSA when we change the active
> slave (but we call xdo_dev_state_delete/xdo_dev_state_add to inform
> the driver/HW), and only a single NEWSA to install the offloaded SA on
> the bond device (which calls the active slave's xdo_dev_state_add).
Maybe I miss something, but how is the sequence number, replay window
etc. transfered from the old to the new active slave?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists