netdev - Re: [PATCH iwl-net v3 1/6] ice: move netif_queue_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <599caa46-3723-1a54-8122-90474bfccfe1@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:20:34 -0700
From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>, Larysa Zaremba
	<larysa.zaremba@...el.com>
CC: <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, "David S. Miller"
	<davem@...emloft.net>, Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, Eric Dumazet
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann
	<daniel@...earbox.net>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, "John
 Fastabend" <john.fastabend@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
	<magnus.karlsson@...el.com>, Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@...el.com>,
	Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>, Amritha Nambiar
	<amritha.nambiar@...el.com>, Chandan Kumar Rout <chandanx.rout@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net v3 1/6] ice: move netif_queue_set_napi to
 rtnl-protected sections

On 8/20/2024 6:26 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:

...

>>>> Fixes: 080b0c8d6d26 ("ice: Fix ASSERT_RTNL() warning during certain scenarios")
>>>
>>> Shouldn't you include:
>>> Fixes: 91fdbce7e8d6 ("ice: Add support in the driver for associating queue with napi")
>>>
>>> as we were iterating over XDP rings that were attached to q_vectors from
>>> the very beginning?
>>>
>>
>> I probably should have done this.
> 
> Maybe this could be included while applying or sending the pull request by
> Tony. I'll go through the rest of set today to see if I have any comments,
> if there won't be anything outstanding then it won't make sense to send
> next revision just to fix the fixes tags.

Yes, I can add that in.

Thanks,
Tony