[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240821125833.000010f7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 12:58:33 +0800
From: Furong Xu <0x1207@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Alexandre Torgue
<alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Joao Pinto <jpinto@...opsys.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xfr@...look.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/7] net: stmmac: refactor FPE verification
process
Hi Vladimir
On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 15:34:56 +0300, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> wrote:
> I took the liberty of rewriting the fpe_task to a timer, and delete the
> workqueue. Here is a completely untested patch, which at least is less
> complex, has less code and is easier to understand. What do you think?
>
Your patch is much better than my ugly implementation ;)
Some small fixes are required to make kselftest-ethtool_mm pass.
Would you mind if I rebase you patch, fix some small issues, make sure all
test cases pass, split it into two patches and include them in my patchset,
then send to review as a Co-developer and a tester?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists