netdev - Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 2/3] bonding: Add ESN support to IPSec HW offload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZsaHTbcZPH0O3RBJ@Laptop-X1>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 08:33:17 +0800
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 2/3] bonding: Add ESN support to IPSec HW
 offload

On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 03:39:48PM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> > > > > +	if (!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
> > > > > +	    !real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_advance_esn) {
> > > > > +		pr_warn("%s: %s doesn't support xdo_dev_state_advance_esn\n", __func__, real_dev->name);
> > > > 
> > > > xdo_dev_state_advance_esn is called on the receive path for every
> > > > packet when ESN is enabled (xfrm_input -> xfrm_replay_advance ->
> > > > xfrm_replay_advance_esn -> xfrm_dev_state_advance_esn), this needs to
> > > > be ratelimited.
> > > 
> > > How does xfrm_state offload work on bonding?
> > > Does every slave have its own negotiated SA?
> > 
> > Yes and no. Bonding only supports xfrm offload with active-backup mode. So only
> > current active slave keep the SA. When active slave changes, the sa on
> > previous slave is deleted and re-added on new active slave.
> 
> It's the same SA, there's no DELSA+NEWSA when we change the active
> slave (but we call xdo_dev_state_delete/xdo_dev_state_add to inform
> the driver/HW), and only a single NEWSA to install the offloaded SA on
> the bond device (which calls the active slave's xdo_dev_state_add).

Yes, thanks for the clarification. The SA is not changed, we just delete it
on old active slave

slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(ipsec->xs);

And add to now one.

ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = slave->dev;
slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add(ipsec->xs, NULL)

Thanks
Hangbin